On Jan 12, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
Axil,
NAE "traps" seem to exist in many forms. DGT seems to have
fabricated "magnetic" traps facilitated by Nano-antennae, which is
what you are referencing. Meulenberg-Sinha in their Extended Lochon
elaborate on electrostatic traps initiated by phonons emanating from
linear defects (or "Nano-cracks"). Even in Ed's theory there is a
variety of "trap", wherein the walls of the NAE become sufficiently
loaded with charge so to facilitate the formation and "trapping" of
Hydroton chains. There is no monopoly on "trap" methodology it would
appear.
As far as Shoulders goes, again, the EVO does not explain He4 or
tritium. I think it may contribute to the overall reaction output as
a secondary or tertiary reaction, and may in fact be the reason we
see transmutations with no radioactive products. But we have to
figure out whether deuterium or tritium is produced in NiH before we
jump to any real conclusions.
As far as Ed's objection that the EVO is only created in spark
discharge plasma, Shoulders also speculates EVO in wet-systems is
formed through sono-luminescent bubble ejections striking the
cathode. So I'm not sure that objection is all that valid, because
theoretically EVO could form in standard electrolysis PdD. But again
it in no way accounts for He4 or tritium in these systems (and
neither does hot fracto-fusion account for these ash either).
You use Shoulder's speculation to counter my claim. You need to use
some facts. Sparks do not occur during electrolysis because the
voltages are too small and bubble collapse does not occur. The bubbles
simply grow and rise to the surface. The sonoluminescent approach has
two parts. Bubble collapse on a target simply injects D into the
target where it fuels the normal CF reaction. The collapse that
produces light initiates hot fusion, not cold fusion. You need to
keep the processes separate because otherwise the process makes no
sense at all.
Regards,
John
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
Ken Shoulders has captured the fundament LENR reaction in a
experimental picture he took.
In more detail, a picture of the dark mode localized magnetic traps
(LMT) can be found in the Ken Shoulders paper on Figure 5 and 6 on
page 4 sited in this vortex post as follows:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg80263.html
Let us discuss this
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]>
wrote:
I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of
transmutation in spark production
I continue to wonder how EVO factors into LENR, if at all. Shoulders
has observed that for whatever reason his experiments do not produce
radioactive elements, similar to LENR transmutation results. Now
unfortunately, like all vacuum energy hypotheses, EVO does not
explain the Heat/Helium correlation nor tritium production in PdD.
Once we know whether deuterium and tritium are being produced in
NiH, we'll be better able to predict the relevance of EVO in that
system.
I suspect that there are about 3-4 different types of reactions
intermingling in all systems. The main reaction is some kind of
cluster fusion phenomenon that produces the nuclear level excess
heat and dissipates nuclear products slowly through photons and
phonons. The secondary and tertiary phenomenon may include
Cavitation, Casmir Forces, EVO, and/or Fracto-Fusion. All
speculation of course.
Regards,
John
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
One manifestation of the LENR reaction that your theoretical
thinking has been very weak on is the explanation of the Rossi
reactor meltdown when high temperature material can melt at
temperatures in excess of 2000C.
Will you now attempt to explain how this high heat event can occur,
and explain the details of how this particular reaction can happen?
I believe that the extremes of a reaction can reveal the detailed
essence of the reaction.
I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of
transmutation in spark production as well as transmutation produced
in the proton 21 experiment?
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]> wrote:
Axil, this insight will be provided in a book that will take my
first book, written in 2007, to the present and show how the
observations have been explained and how they can be better
explained without conflict with what is known. Unfortunately, so
many different opinions exists in the field, no one would believe
what I propose without the complete evidence only a book can provide.
Too many attempts at creating a theory are based on pure imagination
without any relationship to reality or to what is actually observed.
People simply do not read the literature. This is understandable
because about 2000 papers must be found and read, which is a full
time job. Enough information is now available to make rejection of
most theories possible and to identify where the unique mechanism
functions in the process. Nothing about the process conflicts with
what is known. The unique mechanism is new and I predict the full
understanding will warrant a Nobel prize by someone in the distant
future. The best analogy to past discoveries would be the
realization by Pauli that a neutrino-like particle existed based on
how the energy of beta decay was found to be less than the required
mass-energy change. Until then, people had no clue such a particle
was possible. In the case of LENR, a new force is revealed that is
hidden in plain sight in exactly the same way. A person only needs
to know where to look.
My book will describe my path to a solution. Of course, this will
open the door to another rejection event by all the theoreticians
and everyone who thinks they know how the effect works. But, then
the book will speak for itself without my having to waste time in
endless debate.
Ed Storms
On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
I'm in the process of studying all the explanations and comparing
them to what is known in LENR and in general science. The failure to
make progress in explaining LENR is easy to see and a clear path to
the correct explanation is becoming obvious, at least to me. The
problem has a solution if you know where to look.
I am sure that all here want to get a preview of this emerging
solution. Is it possible to reveal to us a preview?
