This is the post you wanted to see as follows: =================================
See references: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&; source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F% 2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1112.6276&ei=nI6UUeG1Fq-N0QGypIAg&usg=AFQjCNFB59F1wkDv- NzeYg5TpnyZV1kpKQ&sig2=fhdWJ_enNKlLA4HboFBTUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ also see http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=331 On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The central dilemma at the very heart of LENR is what causes nuclear > reactions at low energy levels. > > What causes the nuclei of most elements to fall apart and reassemble their > subatomic parts in new ways? > > Two new papers dealing with the nature and workings of the vacuum lend > insight into the LENR question. > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.6165.pdf > > The quantum vacuum as the origin of the speed of light > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.3923v1.pdf > > A sum rule for charged elementary particles > > These papers suggest that the nature of the vacuum is defined by > electromagnetic mechanisms revolving around the action of the constant > creation and destruction of virtual dipoles. > > The nature of radioactive decay is also driven off the action of the > virtual particle life cycle and its electromagnetic consequences. > > These papers also suggest that the nature of space/time can be changed and > controlled by augmentation of this virtual dipole mechanism. > > It is generally recognized that the Fine Structure constant is not a > really a constant at all and can vary. > > > If this FSC can be changed by as little as 4% ether more or less, the > delicate balance between the strong force and the electromagnetic force > will fatally disrupt the forces inside the nucleus. > > A successful LENR system will setup a positive feedback loop that produces > enhanced dipole production caused by enhanced electron tunneling. > > If the proper dipole production topology is created, dipole production > begets enhanced electron tunneling and vice versa. In this way, an extreme > dipole EMF field can be concentrated is a localized volume of space. > > The extreme dipole EMF fields thus produced gets so strong that the fabric > of the vacuum within this nanoscopic localized volume is distorted to the > point that the nuclei of atoms in that volume become unbalanced. The > greatly enhanced and increased dipole EMF counteracts the actions of the > strong force and the nuclei inside the localized volume will fall apart. > The control of this process is possible. Through the control of how the way > that the dipole production topology is setup, the amount of nuclear > disruption is proportional to the strength of the dipole field, from slight > to extreme. > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Did you see this recent post as follows: >> >> =============================== >> >> >> If you remember this thread as follows: >> >> * * >> >> Entangled proton pairs show enhanced tunneling – 1/31/12 >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do entangled proton pairs pass through the coulomb barrier of a heavy >> element nucleus with high probability in collisions with energies well >> below those required to breach this barrier? >> >> >> >> This curiosity has been observed is heavy low energy ion collision >> studies. >> >> >> >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.1393.pdf >> >> >> >> This letter presents evidence that (1) 2p transfer (and >> >> not _-particle transfer) is the dominant transfer process >> >> leading to _Z = 2 events in the reaction 16O+208Pb at >> >> energies well below the fusion barrier, and (2) 2p transfer >> >> is significantly enhanced compared to predictions assum- >> >> ing the sequential transfer of uncorrelated protons, with >> >> absolute probabilities as high as those of 1p transfer at >> >> energies near the fusion barrier. >> >> >> >> Measurements of transfer probabilities in various reac- >> >> tions and at energies near the fusion barrier have there- >> >> fore been utilized to investigate the role of pairing corre- >> >> lations between the transferred nucleons. Pairing effects >> >> are believed to lead to a significant enhancement of pair >> >> and multi-pair transfer probabilities [2, 4{7]. Closely re- >> >> lated to the phenomenon of pairing correlations is the >> >> nuclear Josephson effect [8], which is understood as the >> >> tunneling of nucleon pairs (i.e. nuclear Cooper-pairs) >> >> through a time-dependent barrier at energies near but be- >> >> low the fusion barrier. This effect is believed to be similar >> >> to that of a supercurrent between two superconductors >> >> separated by an insulator. An enhancement of the trans- >> >> fer probability at sub-barrier energies is therefore com- >> >> monly related to the tunneling of (multi-)Cooper-pairs >> >> from one superfluid nucleus to the other [2]. >> >> >> >> >> >> Following up on this thread as follows: >> >> >> >> There has been a new type of Klein tunneling proposed where a >> high-potential barrier can be made transparent. >> >> >> >> Even though the barrier is impenetrable for single particles, it becomes >> transparent when the two particles cross the energy barrier together. >> >> >> >> Coupled particles cross energy wall >> >> >> >> >> http://www.springer.com/about+springer/media/springer+select?SGWID=0-11001-6-1421254-0 >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:51 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Axil, >>> >>> I missed that post. Can you repost the reference. >>> >>> Does it have any relationship with the following arxiv.org paper that >>> might be relevant in plasmons? >>> >>> "New Enhanced Tunneling in Nuclear Processes" >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0307012 >>> >>> ABSTRACT: >>> The small sub-barrier tunneling probability of nuclear processes can be >>> dramatically enhanced by collision with incident charged particles. >>> Semiclassical methods of theory of complex trajectories have been applied >>> to nuclear tunneling, and conditions for the effects have been obtained. >>> We demonstrate the enhancement of alpha particle decay by incident proton >>> with energy of about 0.25 MeV. We show that the general features of this >>> process are common for other sub-barrier nuclear processes and can be >>> applied to nuclear fission. >>> >>> -- Lou Pagnucco >>> >>> >>> >>> Axil^2 wrote: >>> > I showed Joshua Cude an experiment using Nanoplasmonic processes that >>> > changed the alpha particle emission half-life of U232 form 69 years to >>> 6 >>> > microseconds. >>> > [...] >>> >>> >> >
