The activator consumes 900W of electricity and produces 910W of usable heat. This heat is used by the client. It is not consumed by the ecat.
The ecat consumes zero heat and produces 1kW (or 10kW if it was a typo) of usable heat. Either way of typo or not, the ecat as a stand-alone system within this configuration could be seen as producing heat without consuming any energy. This is the way Rossi is explaining it. On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Patrick Ellul's message of Wed, 15 May 2013 07:41:21 +1000: > Hi, > [snip] > >You are right Alan. He should really call the 1kW the kitten, to avoid > >confusion. > > > >About the "i-dont-want-to-say-infinite-so-i-say-200-to-300" issues... he > >explains that if the activator "pays-for-itself", then the actual ecat is > >giving free energy. > > I wonder if the Activator produces 910 W in excess of the 900 W consumed, > or > only 10 W in excess? > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > > -- Patrick www.tRacePerfect.com The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect! The quickest puzzle ever!
