In reply to Patrick Ellul's message of Wed, 15 May 2013 07:41:21 +1000: Hi, [snip] >You are right Alan. He should really call the 1kW the kitten, to avoid >confusion. > >About the "i-dont-want-to-say-infinite-so-i-say-200-to-300" issues... he >explains that if the activator "pays-for-itself", then the actual ecat is >giving free energy.
I wonder if the Activator produces 910 W in excess of the 900 W consumed, or only 10 W in excess? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
