On 09/01/2012 04:24 PM, David L Babcock wrote:
An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below:
[seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs.
"It isn't just solar flares that seem to induce changes in
radioactive decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and
activity,/and the Earth's position on its orbital path around the
Sun also appear to have an effect/, and it's the latter variable
which seems to have been decisive in the research. Between July
2005 and June 2011, continued monitoring has apparently shown
consistent annual variation in the decay rate of chlorine 36,
peaking in January and February, and ebbing in July and
August."(Emphasis added)
Read more:NEW DETECTION METHOD FOR SOLAR FLARES: VARIATIONS IN
RADIATION EMISSION
<http://gizadeathstar.com/2012/08/new-detection-method-for-solar-flares-variations-in-radiation-emission/#ixzz25FHEeuxf>
- Giza Death Star Community
This really rang my chimes, as I had read -a month or two ago?- that
the existence of the ether has some good evidence for it, and that
measurements showed that the solar system is moving through this ether
at IIRC 4,000 km/hr, towards (some point).
Towards the Solar apex <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_apex>, at
roughly 16 km/s, or 57600 km/h. Not to be confused with the orbital
movement of the Sun (and the Solar system) around the Galactic center,
which is of roughly 220 km/s, and is called the movement of the Local
Standard of Rest. Now, that's interesting in itself, the Local Standard
of Rest, as they call it. Which that means? It means that everything in
the local vicinity of the Sun is moving at that speed. And the question
that is most interesting to ask yourself is, which does "everything"
means, particularly in this context?, that is, in the context of the arm
of the galaxy we're in.
Regarding changes in decay rates and the relation to cosmic factors,
this has been discussed here in the past, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg34721.html
I even wrote to Sturrock and Fischbach, suggesting that a kind of
friction against the ether background can explain the phase difference
between the changes in decay rates and the Sun-Earth distance, i.e. that
the changes seem to be aligned with the direction the Solar system has
towards the Solar apex. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg39971.html
Just to be completely ignored, of course.
Best regards,
Mauro
If these two hideous heresies should turn out to agree the whole
edifice of modern physics may crumble.
I wish I could provide a link to the ether article, it was a peach,
giving (?) ten anomalous stick-in-your-eye findings that physics won't
look at.
Ol' Bab, who was an engineer
