I suggest shielding the radioactive source from electromagnetic fields (using a tempest cage), then see if the rates still change or remain the constant. Cheers: Axil On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:24 PM, David L Babcock <[email protected]>wrote:
> An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below: > > [seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs. > > “It isn’t just solar flares that seem to induce changes in radioactive > decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and activity, *and the Earth’s > position on its orbital path around the Sun also appear to have an effect*, > and it’s the latter variable which seems to have been decisive in the > research. Between July 2005 and June 2011, continued monitoring has > apparently shown consistent annual variation in the decay rate of chlorine > 36, peaking in January and February, and ebbing in July and > August.”(Emphasis added) > Read more: NEW DETECTION METHOD FOR SOLAR FLARES: VARIATIONS IN RADIATION > EMISSION<http://gizadeathstar.com/2012/08/new-detection-method-for-solar-flares-variations-in-radiation-emission/#ixzz25FHEeuxf> > > - Giza Death Star Community > > > This really rang my chimes, as I had read -a month or two ago?- that the > existence of the ether has some good evidence for it, and that measurements > showed that the solar system is moving through this ether at IIRC 4,000 > km/hr, towards (some point). > If these two hideous heresies should turn out to agree the whole edifice > of modern physics may crumble. > > > I wish I could provide a link to the ether article, it was a peach, giving > (?) ten anomalous stick-in-your-eye findings that physics won't look at. > > Ol' Bab, who was an engineer > >
