>From what I've read, Celani and al have currently made 2 wires only. One of the wires has blown out during a test with D2.
-----Original Message----- From: Akira Shirakawa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: mercredi 15 août 2012 18:16 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Celani device update On 2012-08-15 07:11, Jed Rothwell wrote: > 13:48 local time. > > The reaction has been fluctuating all day with amplitude about as big as > the screen shot taken at 9:21 this morning. It was not just the air > conditioning. It went briefly to 15 W but dropped back and has stated > around 14 W. It is not increasing. In Texas it went up to 21 W > before stabilizing. [...] Thanks for the update. Could you also ask Celani if he's ever tried putting more than an active wire inside the cell, in order make excess power even more observable (a nice suggestion I read on discussion boards around)? When testing conditions aren't tightly controlled, as in trade shows such as NIWeek 2012 or meetings like ICCF17, perhaps it's better to just increase the net effect rather than trying to keep its potential scientific value (in terms of data). Since the active wire reportedly (as per Celani's presentation/paper) heats up with a positive feedback with cell temperature after a certain threshold, without need to be directly heated, COP would increase and influence by external factors and error margins would decrease. Cheers, S.A.
