On 2012-08-15 07:11, Jed Rothwell wrote:
13:48 local time.
The reaction has been fluctuating all day with amplitude about as big as
the screen shot taken at 9:21 this morning. It was not just the air
conditioning. It went briefly to 15 W but dropped back and has stated
around 14 W. It is not increasing. In Texas it went up to 21 W
before stabilizing.
[...]
Thanks for the update.
Could you also ask Celani if he's ever tried putting more than an active
wire inside the cell, in order make excess power even more observable (a
nice suggestion I read on discussion boards around)? When testing
conditions aren't tightly controlled, as in trade shows such as NIWeek
2012 or meetings like ICCF17, perhaps it's better to just increase the
net effect rather than trying to keep its potential scientific value (in
terms of data).
Since the active wire reportedly (as per Celani's presentation/paper)
heats up with a positive feedback with cell temperature after a certain
threshold, without need to be directly heated, COP would increase and
influence by external factors and error margins would decrease.
Cheers,
S.A.
