INAL = me no lawyer. I meant IANAL but, geeze, I'm not anally retentive either.
T On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:11 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> I assume Rossi is referring to his attempts to get adequate USA patent >> protection. > > > INAL, and maybe Beene or Ransom will interject here but, does not Rossi > already have patent protection having filed his patent? He can build eCats > and start shipping with a patent pending label. He's gonna need a gaggle > of lawyers to enforce this patent anyway after he starts rolling in the > megabucks. > > (Or is that a murder of lawyers?) > > T >
