Rossi is being a victim of himself, and only himself, by not making a clear patent. That's all I have to say.
2012/2/3 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <[email protected]> > PESN had the following to say concerning the latest info on Rossi's > attempt to get adequate patent protection: > > http://pesn.com/2012/02/02/9602025_E-Cat_Weekly_February2/ > > ***************************************************************** > * Patents > > - On January 17, 2012, T.O. wrote: "I have a very good friend, that is > high ranking, in the patent office and he said he would check where > the application is in the process." > > - On January 31, 2012, T.O. wrote: "I found out today that the E-Cat > patent is through the security section and now is in a cue to be > assigned to a Patent Examiner. My friend thought that at current > workflow that it should be done by the end of the year. Of course > things could change. He could not say if it would be approved or > denied." > When this was forwarded to Andrea Rossi on Feb. 2, he responded: > Dear Sterling, we know. > Warm Regards, > A. > > ***************************************************************** > > I assume Rossi is referring to his attempts to get adequate USA patent > protection. At first glance what Rossi seems to be saying here does > not strike me as terribly encouraging news. It's sounds so iffy to me. > What would stop the USPO from denying Rossi's patent application as > just another one of those infernal CF contraptions for which patent > researchers were presumably told to discard? Or worse, what's to stop > them from simply placing Rossi's application on-hold, perhaps because > a new memo just came down the pipeline instructing that all new "CF" > related applications be placed in a special folder where someone > higher up in the food chain will deal with the matter - later. Much > later. > > Comments? > > Regards > Steven Vincent Johnson > www.OrionWorks.com > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
