Mats referenced a box inside, bolted to the bottom with a heat sink on top, 
measuring 30cmx30cmx30cm.  He couldn't see inside of it, just a box with some 
port connections for hydrogen, heater, and, presumably, RF.  So, assuming, say 
4cm for the heat exchanger, this could be 30x30x26, or  23,400 cm^3.  
According to Rossi, that box is sealed tight and "waterproof".  Rossi further 
explains what is inside of that container, but nobody is ever allowed to look 
inside. So, despite his decriptions (in the October test, he indicates that 
there is only one 20x20x4 "wafer") we have to treat the 30x30x26 block as a 
complete unknown. No assumptions made to "rule out" chemical reactions should 
preclude the entire 23,400cm^3 from being used.



Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 13:06:47 -0200
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a long paper about and mainly against the E-cat
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Isn't the hidden volume 24x24x5= 2880cm^3 large?


2011/12/8 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>


Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:


 



So there was an uninspected volume of about 30 cube centimeters cube.


Right. That's what I said. There is no way equipment in such a small cube can 
explain the heat. I said: "They have not seen inside the cell (which is inside 
the reactor) but the volume of the cell is too small for any tricks."


- Jed




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
[email protected]
                                          

Reply via email to