On 11-12-07 04:01 PM, David Roberson wrote:
Dear Josh, at least you are consistent. Always claiming that someone
or something is not as it appears. MY realizes she might be in error
and I respect her for some honesty. Now, do you sincerely think that
the large generator was supplying the heat energy to vaporize the
water? If all of us on the vortex tried to find ways to scam the
public as you seem to enjoy, do you not think we could be successful
like you? Sometimes realism needs to float to the top.
All you ever seem to do is to tear down things and people. Why not
use your talents for the good instead? What would it take for you to
be finally convinced that the 1 MW system is real? I would honestly
like to know the answer to that question.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua Cude <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, Dec 7, 2011 3:11 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a long paper about and mainly against the E-cat
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have always maintained that I will follow the evidence and have
been faithful to that end.
That is not consistent with your frequently expressed absolute
certainty that LENR is occurring.
Why should we assume that a well trained engineer would be so
stupid as to be incapable of catching water?
Because of the geometry of the trap. It would not capture entrained mist.
Why should we assume that a well-trained engineer would be so stupid
as to be incapable of knowing the output flow rate?
Please read the Wikipedia article on steam locomotives to put
things in some perspective.I would estimate that the total area of
Rossi's 107 ECATs is comparable to that of boiler within one of
these devices.How do you think that they can function at all if
most of the steam leaving has a quality of 5% or so as you keep
repeating?
How does steam engines producing dry steam mean that the ecats are?
You need more than the same area. You also need the power. The water
level in steam engine boilers is regulated to ensure dry steam.
If by "steam engine" you mean "steam locomotive engine", then they
actually incorporated steam driers specifically to dry the steam after
it left the boiler and, IIRC, before it entered the superheater. That's
what at least some of those funny domes on the tops of the old
locomotives had inside them.
The designers did not simply assume the steam came straight out of the
boiler "already dry".
