On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> So there was an uninspected volume of about 30 cube centimeters cube. >> > > Right. That's what I said. There is no way equipment in such a small cube > can explain the heat. I said: "They have not seen inside the cell (which is > inside the reactor) but the volume of the cell is too small for any tricks." > > > How is that too small. It's big enough for the most innocuous of methods. A 3rd of the volume filled with fire brick at 1000C would do it. Far less is needed for molten metals, and still less for fuels like alcohol (with an oxygen candle) or even Ni-H. Now, can you name a single nuclear reaction that fits the data?
