Not so simple, what is a "definitive result"? I take for comparison my BOSCH 3000W home heater.
I also don't say it doesn't work, but I have well founded doubts it does not work well yet. And the demonstration tests have eroded my confidence both in the E-cats (3, 4 types?) and in their author. Peter On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Peter Heckert <[email protected]>wrote: > Here they write, the "Household e-cat will be tested in Upsalla. > > <http://ecathome.com/e-cat/vafter-the-bologna-test-next-up-is-the-uppsala-test-of-an-e-cat-home-unit><http://ecathome.com/e-cat/vafter-the-bologna-test-next-up-is-the-uppsala-test-of-an-e-cat-home-unit> > If so, and if this has a definitive result, he has won. > So far I know, the test will be designed by the university and by Rossi. > > Then, of course, if it is sold there will be independent institutions > testing it. "Stiftung Warentest" and Magazines do this in Germany it is an > independent organization to test quality in the interest of consumers. > > I dont say it doesnt work. > I say I am unsatisfied with the demonstrations so far. > I will wait for this. > > Am 16.10.2011 18:46, schrieb Peter Gluck: > > Yes customer psychology can be strange, but the best > marketing will not sell a "perpetuum stabile" - or if you wish > it in German a clock "ohne Mechanismus" > The E-cat is not an energy source yet. Punktum! > > Peter > > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Peter Heckert <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I know customers. >> >> with complicated products it quite often happens, that they complain even >> when everything is fine ;-) >> Hope, he is prepared for this. >> >> It also happens that customers fanatically believe in products and are >> totally happy, but the product doesnt work at all. >> Look here, these companies have satisfied customers for 20 years now, but >> the products dont do anything: >> >> http://www.aquapol-deutschland.de/ (drying of buildings with zeropoint >> energy - no other power) >> http://www.ecojet.com/ (Increasing efficiency of oil and gas burners with >> magnets) >> >> Of course they have also unsatisfied customers and for these they have >> good lawyers ;-) >> >> >> >> Am 16.10.2011 18:16, schrieb Peter Gluck: >> >> >> >> Today this message was published on Rossi's Blog. >> >> Andrea Rossi >> October 16th, 2011 at 2:14 >> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=22#comment-97993> >> >> Dear Giovanni: >> We will run also in self sustained mode, the periods will depend on many >> factors. In any case, the power output will be 6 times the power input. >> About the snakes: the time of the snakes is over. The start up of the 1 MW >> plant is the end of the mental masturbations of enviuos, wannabe theorists, >> lecturers of calorimetry and engineering. Now LENR goes to the market. The >> test will not be made by me, but by the Customers’ consultants. Time of >> chatters is over. Maybe the test will not be good, maybe: it will be the >> first time I will start up a plant of that dimension, but in this case the >> problem will be the Customer, not the bunch of imbeciles that instead of >> understanding that we actually made LENR a reality lose their time digging >> holes on the surface the water in the middle of the ocean to find the wine. >> And in the case this test will go not well, we will learn and remake >> another, and another, and another, but, be sure, we will arrive to the >> target. At any cost. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> Well written. On the negative side the finale "at any cost" is >> frightening. Pereat mundus, fiat E-cattus! Who will pay these costs? >> Obviously the Customer.- an ideal one. >> On the positive side I like the use of the metaphor of the digging a hole >> of the Ocean for finding wine despite the fact that it does not describe >> well the activity of those mentally impaired persons who are not 120% E-cat >> enthusiasts. >> >> Till now the triumph of the 1MW demo was an certainty, now it seems that >> due to the sabotage of some imbeciles >> using autodestructive however cheap sexual practices, >> the !MW setup has lost its technological perfection. Hopefully new details >> will be known, I am too limited in thinking to see the correlation. >> >> The idea that there can be some problems with the Demo has appeared >> yesterday. Today http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Kkxbw3s2pM we get a >> message saying "No more tests!" >> >> http://ecatnow.com/ecat-news/ecat/no-more-tests-except-for-an-e-cat-home-test-let-the-customers/ >> >> I have tried to send a comment, but I fear it will not be published. >> Here it is: >> >> "*The message is not very clear- no more tests before the ! MW demo of >> Oct 28? >> >> No more tests at all? >> >> A sellable product most have a specification, instruction of use, must be >> authorized >> by some expert bureaucratic organizations, must have a guarantee- safety, >> performances and so on… >> >> You cannot sell an :”E-cat in the sack.”- the title of one of my essays re >> this subject. >> Rossi seemed to be enchanted with the October 6 test and all the questions >> re measurements were considered malevolent nit-picking. >> >> How does correlate this decision with some statements of Rossi that some >> troubles can appear at the triumphal 1 MW test? >> >> The great questions is: what is more dangerously immature- this mode of >> management or the >> E-cat itself?" >> * >> >> Let me add again and again that 6 thermal energy units for 1 energy unit >> is a modest less that 2 $ for 1 $ if we ignore investment and some other >> expenses. >> >> Evviva il Customer! >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
