Here they write, the "Household e-cat will be tested in Upsalla.
<http://ecathome.com/e-cat/vafter-the-bologna-test-next-up-is-the-uppsala-test-of-an-e-cat-home-unit>
If so, and if this has a definitive result, he has won.
So far I know, the test will be designed by the university and by Rossi.
Then, of course, if it is sold there will be independent institutions
testing it. "Stiftung Warentest" and Magazines do this in Germany it is
an independent organization to test quality in the interest of consumers.
I dont say it doesnt work.
I say I am unsatisfied with the demonstrations so far.
I will wait for this.
Am 16.10.2011 18:46, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Yes customer psychology can be strange, but the best
marketing will not sell a "perpetuum stabile" - or if you wish
it in German a clock "ohne Mechanismus"
The E-cat is not an energy source yet. Punktum!
Peter
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Peter Heckert <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I know customers.
with complicated products it quite often happens, that they
complain even when everything is fine ;-)
Hope, he is prepared for this.
It also happens that customers fanatically believe in products and
are totally happy, but the product doesnt work at all.
Look here, these companies have satisfied customers for 20 years
now, but the products dont do anything:
http://www.aquapol-deutschland.de/ (drying of buildings with
zeropoint energy - no other power)
http://www.ecojet.com/ (Increasing efficiency of oil and gas
burners with magnets)
Of course they have also unsatisfied customers and for these they
have good lawyers ;-)
Am 16.10.2011 18:16, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Today this message was published on Rossi's Blog.
Andrea Rossi
October 16th, 2011 at 2:14 AM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=22#comment-97993>
Dear Giovanni:
We will run also in self sustained mode, the periods will depend
on many factors. In any case, the power output will be 6 times
the power input. About the snakes: the time of the snakes is
over. The start up of the 1 MW plant is the end of the mental
masturbations of enviuos, wannabe theorists, lecturers of
calorimetry and engineering. Now LENR goes to the market. The
test will not be made by me, but by the Customers’ consultants.
Time of chatters is over. Maybe the test will not be good, maybe:
it will be the first time I will start up a plant of that
dimension, but in this case the problem will be the Customer, not
the bunch of imbeciles that instead of understanding that we
actually made LENR a reality lose their time digging holes on the
surface the water in the middle of the ocean to find the wine.
And in the case this test will go not well, we will learn and
remake another, and another, and another, but, be sure, we will
arrive to the target. At any cost.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Well written. On the negative side the finale "at any cost" is
frightening. Pereat mundus, fiat E-cattus! Who will pay these
costs? Obviously the Customer.- an ideal one.
On the positive side I like the use of the metaphor of the
digging a hole of the Ocean for finding wine despite the fact
that it does not describe well the activity of those mentally
impaired persons who are not 120% E-cat enthusiasts.
Till now the triumph of the 1MW demo was an certainty, now it
seems that due to the sabotage of some imbeciles
using autodestructive however cheap sexual practices,
the !MW setup has lost its technological perfection. Hopefully
new details will be known, I am too limited in thinking to see
the correlation.
The idea that there can be some problems with the Demo has
appeared yesterday. Today
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Kkxbw3s2pM we get a message
saying "No more tests!"
http://ecatnow.com/ecat-news/ecat/no-more-tests-except-for-an-e-cat-home-test-let-the-customers/
I have tried to send a comment, but I fear it will not be
published. Here it is:
"/The message is not very clear- no more tests before the ! MW
demo of Oct 28?
No more tests at all?
A sellable product most have a specification, instruction of use,
must be authorized
by some expert bureaucratic organizations, must have a guarantee-
safety, performances and so on…
You cannot sell an :”E-cat in the sack.”- the title of one of my
essays re this subject.
Rossi seemed to be enchanted with the October 6 test and all the
questions re measurements were considered malevolent nit-picking.
How does correlate this decision with some statements of Rossi
that some troubles can appear at the triumphal 1 MW test?
The great questions is: what is more dangerously immature- this
mode of management or the
E-cat itself?"
/
Let me add again and again that 6 thermal energy units for 1
energy unit is a modest less that 2 $ for 1 $ if we ignore
investment and some other expenses.
Evviva il Customer!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
