I know customers.
with complicated products it quite often happens, that they complain
even when everything is fine ;-)
Hope, he is prepared for this.
It also happens that customers fanatically believe in products and are
totally happy, but the product doesnt work at all.
Look here, these companies have satisfied customers for 20 years now,
but the products dont do anything:
http://www.aquapol-deutschland.de/ (drying of buildings with zeropoint
energy - no other power)
http://www.ecojet.com/ (Increasing efficiency of oil and gas burners
with magnets)
Of course they have also unsatisfied customers and for these they have
good lawyers ;-)
Am 16.10.2011 18:16, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Today this message was published on Rossi's Blog.
Andrea Rossi
October 16th, 2011 at 2:14 AM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=22#comment-97993>
Dear Giovanni:
We will run also in self sustained mode, the periods will depend on
many factors. In any case, the power output will be 6 times the power
input. About the snakes: the time of the snakes is over. The start up
of the 1 MW plant is the end of the mental masturbations of enviuos,
wannabe theorists, lecturers of calorimetry and engineering. Now LENR
goes to the market. The test will not be made by me, but by the
Customers’ consultants. Time of chatters is over. Maybe the test will
not be good, maybe: it will be the first time I will start up a plant
of that dimension, but in this case the problem will be the Customer,
not the bunch of imbeciles that instead of understanding that we
actually made LENR a reality lose their time digging holes on the
surface the water in the middle of the ocean to find the wine. And in
the case this test will go not well, we will learn and remake another,
and another, and another, but, be sure, we will arrive to the target.
At any cost.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Well written. On the negative side the finale "at any cost" is
frightening. Pereat mundus, fiat E-cattus! Who will pay these costs?
Obviously the Customer.- an ideal one.
On the positive side I like the use of the metaphor of the digging a
hole of the Ocean for finding wine despite the fact that it does not
describe well the activity of those mentally impaired persons who are
not 120% E-cat enthusiasts.
Till now the triumph of the 1MW demo was an certainty, now it seems
that due to the sabotage of some imbeciles
using autodestructive however cheap sexual practices,
the !MW setup has lost its technological perfection. Hopefully new
details will be known, I am too limited in thinking to see the
correlation.
The idea that there can be some problems with the Demo has appeared
yesterday. Today http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Kkxbw3s2pM we get a
message saying "No more tests!"
http://ecatnow.com/ecat-news/ecat/no-more-tests-except-for-an-e-cat-home-test-let-the-customers/
I have tried to send a comment, but I fear it will not be published.
Here it is:
"/The message is not very clear- no more tests before the ! MW demo of
Oct 28?
No more tests at all?
A sellable product most have a specification, instruction of use, must
be authorized
by some expert bureaucratic organizations, must have a guarantee-
safety, performances and so on…
You cannot sell an :”E-cat in the sack.”- the title of one of my
essays re this subject.
Rossi seemed to be enchanted with the October 6 test and all the
questions re measurements were considered malevolent nit-picking.
How does correlate this decision with some statements of Rossi that
some troubles can appear at the triumphal 1 MW test?
The great questions is: what is more dangerously immature- this mode
of management or the
E-cat itself?"
/
Let me add again and again that 6 thermal energy units for 1 energy
unit is a modest less that 2 $ for 1 $ if we ignore investment and
some other expenses.
Evviva il Customer!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
