The following recent broadcast by "Need to Know" may provide some useful data.

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/economy/video-are-public- employee-unions-to-blame-for-states-budget-problems/7904/

http://tinyurl.com/4hyt6jw

"Public plans are substantially underfunded, however, in the aggregate they only account for 3.8% of state spending."

"... long term patterns indicate that the average compensation of state and local employees is not excessive."

The current underfunding of pension plans is not unique to government pensions - it is true of private pensions as well. This is largely the fault of congress which permitted, over recent decades, the raiding of pension funds based the diminishing of contributions based on prevailing interest rates and stock market performance.

I have my own explanation as well. In addition to the long term underfunding, the short term retirement fund crisis can be in part blamed on the Fed., for dropping interest rates to near zero. This diminishes the dividends or fixed interest rates the pension funds can earn. This in turn increases the actuarial value required to fund a fixed pension. For example, to fund a $10,000 pension when a fund can earn near 5% takes only about $200,000. However, when interest rates drop to 1.5%, it takes about $670,000 to fund the same benefit. A $200B fund that was marginally solvent at 5% rates, suddenly requires $670B to be fully funded, thus is instantly facing a $470B underfunding. The stock market may stay afloat but the dividends and interest drop and the pensions become underfunded. Lets hope the pension guarantee fund can stay afloat or private and government pensions will disappear alike. We also should hope insurance companies and banks paying annuities and carrying straight life balances manage to stay afloat, for the same reasons.

As for pay being equivalent in the long term, that is no surprise either. Salary negotiations with unions are often based on local salary surveys, taken periodically, e.g. every 5 years or so, which take into account salary and benefits, as well as skill levels, longevity, and job definitions. It is no accident that independent survey mentioned in the above broadcast found that the average compensation of state and local employees is not excessive.

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to