I'm sorry, I can't make sense of this.
If tau is the local time for a tiny observer located inside the cavity,
and t is time for an external observer, what's dt/dtau?
And why should it be anything other than 1?
Because it is a protected harbour where vacuum fluctuations flowing
from future to past intersect with 3D space briefly wink into and out of
existence while keeping atomic orbitalls sustained as in the Puthoff model.
I am positing that we are NOT the opposite extreme from an event horizon and
that our standard ratio of time to space is reflected in the ratio of short
to long vacuum fluctuation wavelengths (AKA large and small virtual
particles) known to vary in Casimir cavities and I suspect approaching an
event horizon, There is variable rate of intersection between time and space
and I am saying the cavity forms a bubble that slows that rate of
intersection relative to outside the cavity.
I have no idea what you mean by "longer flux twisted on the time axis";
larger virtual particles displaced on time axis appear smaller due to
contraction
I have no idea what it means to twist something on the time axis. Could
you show the transform you have in mind? Sorry I use the tem twist instead
of displacement to simplify the animation. http://byzipp.com/energy/
For example, for the Lorentz transform, with c=1 and g=dt/dtau, and
motion along the x axis, we have
| tau | | g -vg 0 0 |
| x' | | -vg g 0 0 |
| y' | = | 0 0 1 0 |
| z' | | 0 0 0 1 |
unless I typed it in wrong. That's a hyperbolic rotation, of course,
but it doesn't sound like you have that in mind, and in any case it is
the unity transform unless the frames are in motion with respect to each
other. In the present case, the frames are stationary with respect to
each other, and the Lorentz transform is just I.
My point is there is relative motion, our space time outside the cavity is
rushing around a bubble created by the "up converted" vacuum fluctuations
inside the cavity.
So, what transform are you proposing using, and how are you proposing
applying it in order to obtain something other than dt/dtau=1 in this case?
>
> The trig would be our temporal vector at some low angle say about 10
degrees
> above horizontal
How can you have a temporal vector at some angle above horizontal? That
seems to mix space and time measures in a way that doesn't make a lot of
apparent sense; perhaps you need to define some terms here. What's a
"temporal vector"?
I am collapsing all 3 spatial axis onto the x axis and time onto the Y. I am
saying we have a normally negligible temporal component that becomes
dominant when for instance a twin approaches the speed of light and returns
home to find the other twin aged.
Combined vector might be a better term representing the temporal rise over
the spatial run of the vector. This vector would be almost vertical for an
object approaching C and almost horizontal in a Casimir cavity. Jan Naudts
introduced the concept of a relativistic solution for the hydrino and Ron
Bourgoin published a paper that exactly matched the 137 fractional quantum
states claimed by Mills. His formula can be inverted to also suggest 137
super states of the hydrogen atom that I contend would manifest approaching
the event horizon.
> might be up aroung 85 degrees which causes the
> accepted Lorentz contraction as time and space trade parameters while the
> vector length remains constant. I am proposing catalysts all create
Casimir
> cavities which accelerate their reactions from our perspective by actually
> Widening the time axis while compressing the spatial axis. This is still a
> relativistic displacement but max acceleration is now on the temporal axis
How do you accelerate along the temporal axis? What does that mean?
Do you mean dt/dtau is an increasing function of ... what, exactly?
What do you use for a time base to measure acceleration along the time axis?
> and the spatial vector appear to take on fractional quantum states.
>
> I have another blog regarding this subject here
> http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/comment/reply/22908
I'd like to see some of your terms defined a bit better before I take
time to read your blog or look at animations.
