Frank wrote: > I have a better explanation with animation at http://byzipp.com/energy/ but > basically it is just trig. I am saying that our perspective relative to the > equivalent speed approaching an event horizon has a corollary in the Casimir > cavity where I propose all vacuum fluctuations are "up converted" as QED > refers to the inhibition of longer wavelengths between narrowing conductive > plates. QED suggests the restricted longer wavelength flux are replaced with > shorter wavelengths. I am proposing that they are the same longer flux > twisted on the time axis which simply appears shorter from our perspective > AND I posit that all the flux regardless of frequency twist as one fabric > inside the cavity. I believe that this is a form of Lorentz contraction in > that space time inside the cavity is slowed relative to outside the cavity > and that atoms diffused in the cavity see outside the cavity in the same way > we observe the twin approaching an event horizon only now from our > perspective time is accelerated instead of slowed.
I'm sorry, I can't make sense of this. If tau is the local time for a tiny observer located inside the cavity, and t is time for an external observer, what's dt/dtau? And why should it be anything other than 1? I have no idea what you mean by "longer flux twisted on the time axis"; I have no idea what it means to twist something on the time axis. Could you show the transform you have in mind? For example, for the Lorentz transform, with c=1 and g=dt/dtau, and motion along the x axis, we have | tau | | g -vg 0 0 | | x' | | -vg g 0 0 | | y' | = | 0 0 1 0 | | z' | | 0 0 0 1 | unless I typed it in wrong. That's a hyperbolic rotation, of course, but it doesn't sound like you have that in mind, and in any case it is the unity transform unless the frames are in motion with respect to each other. In the present case, the frames are stationary with respect to each other, and the Lorentz transform is just I. So, what transform are you proposing using, and how are you proposing applying it in order to obtain something other than dt/dtau=1 in this case? > > The trig would be our temporal vector at some low angle say about 10 degrees > above horizontal How can you have a temporal vector at some angle above horizontal? That seems to mix space and time measures in a way that doesn't make a lot of apparent sense; perhaps you need to define some terms here. What's a "temporal vector"? > representing the spatial axii while the paradox twin > approaching an event horizon What's a "paradox twin" and what event horizon is it approaching? > might be up aroung 85 degrees which causes the > accepted Lorentz contraction as time and space trade parameters while the > vector length remains constant. I am proposing catalysts all create Casimir > cavities which accelerate their reactions from our perspective by actually > Widening the time axis while compressing the spatial axis. This is still a > relativistic displacement but max acceleration is now on the temporal axis How do you accelerate along the temporal axis? What does that mean? Do you mean dt/dtau is an increasing function of ... what, exactly? What do you use for a time base to measure acceleration along the time axis? > and the spatial vector appear to take on fractional quantum states. > > I have another blog regarding this subject here > http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/comment/reply/22908 I'd like to see some of your terms defined a bit better before I take time to read your blog or look at animations.
