I have a better explanation with animation at http://byzipp.com/energy/ but
basically it is just trig. I am saying that our perspective relative to the
equivalent speed approaching an event horizon has a corollary in the Casimir
cavity where I propose all vacuum fluctuations are "up converted" as QED
refers to the inhibition of longer wavelengths between narrowing conductive
plates. QED suggests the restricted longer wavelength flux are replaced with
shorter wavelengths. I am proposing that they are the same longer flux
twisted on the time axis which simply appears shorter from our perspective
AND I posit that all the flux regardless of frequency twist as one fabric
inside the cavity. I believe that this is a form of Lorentz contraction in
that space time inside the cavity is slowed relative to outside the cavity
and that atoms diffused in the cavity see outside the cavity in the same way
we observe the twin approaching an event horizon only now from our
perspective time is accelerated instead of slowed. 

The trig would be our temporal vector at some low angle say about 10 degrees
above horizontal representing the spatial axii while the paradox twin
approaching an event horizon might be up aroung 85 degrees which causes the
accepted Lorentz contraction as time and space trade parameters while the
vector length remains constant. I am proposing  catalysts all create Casimir
cavities which accelerate their reactions from our perspective by actually
Widening the time axis while compressing the spatial axis. This is still a
relativistic displacement but max acceleration is now on the temporal axis
and the spatial vector appear to take on fractional quantum states.

I have another blog regarding this subject here
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/comment/reply/22908 


Roarty, Francis X wrote:

> 
>  I am proposing that Lorentz contraction
> can occur in the opposite direction creating a time dilation where the
> gas diffused in a Casimir cavity appears to accelerate while the orbital
> diameter quite correctly calculates smaller than ground state because it
> is contracting away on the temporal axis.

I didn't quite follow this; English explanations, as always, tend to be
a bit fuzzy.  Could you characterize this reversed Lorentz contraction
mathematically, and show where you believe it comes from?

Lorentz contraction, so called, takes place when we shift our point of
view from one reference frame to another, and mathematically, it falls
out of the Lorentz transform for mapping coordinates in one inertial
frame to another.  What frames are we discussing here, and what
transform, exactly, are you proposing using which will result in
reversed contraction and (apparently) reversed time dilation?


> This only explains catalytic
> action but I suspect a Rigid catalyst can restrict access to the
> temporal axis such that only atoms can translate between hydrino and
> hydrogen states. Therefore monatomic gas diffusing deep into a temporal
> corridor

What, exactly, is a temporal corridor?

Could you characterize it mathematically?  (The English phrase "temporal
corridor" doesn't do a lot for me, I'm afraid.)

Reply via email to