IMO if there is a deliterious effect associated with man-made sources of EM radiation it is a function of the intensity and the *patterns* emitted.
After all, our brains and bodies did not evolve in such a web of EM patterns. Harry ----- Original Message ----- From: David Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, August 4, 2008 3:36 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electric smog versus cosmic background radiation > Show this in better detail. it depends a lot on how close the > mobile is. > Another factor is that we have like 100% exposure to cosmic > radiation but > only 2% to mobile phones. > > If it is as bad as you say then we are smoked, or rather irradiated. > Specifically the gender cell productions is challenged and during > the last > decades the sperm quality has declined dramatically. Radiation is > likelyused in meiotic recombination, a process in production of > sperm cells and > ova. > > David > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The CBE is about 5 to 6 orders of magnitude less than cell phone > > radiation. Also, cell phone radiation peaks near the microwave oven > > frequency. Doh! > > > > Terry > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, David Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > In determining the hazard of mobile phones I came to think of > one way of > > > doing it. Compare the net effect from > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_background_radiation and other > > natural > > > sources and compare that with phones. If phoneas are equal and > less then > > > there wouldn't be much of a problem. > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > -- > David Jonsson > Sweden > phone callto:+46703000370 >
