>Can't answer for the Brits, but we here in the U. S. of A. initiated a
>minor disagreement with them 224 years ago over other "ethical stances"
>of like nature. Where there is opportunity for misuse and/or
>corruption by authority, it is assured that such misuse/corruption will be
>seized and utilized.
To be fair, LOTS of people have had "ethical stance" issues with the U. S. of A.
since that little tussle.
>If an organization's personnel morale is so poor that
>trust in them to do the right thing is abandoned, perhaps it's time to
>look at reorganizing the institution. By the way, I for one would be
I recommended too him, off list, that perhaps Squid-proxy and a firewall would
be a better way to solve the problem. "Control" is always better than "monitor
(spy?)", and I think it would require less work. But that's not really a VNC
topic.
I think the icon should stay. But some method of making the configuration
"read-only" would be nice.
>interested in knowing just what constitutes a "dangerous political
>site" within an educational environment.
I wondered about that one too.
Systems and Network Administrator
Morrison Industries
1825 Monroe Ave NW.
Grand Rapids, MI. 49505
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
