Oh man, you've totally screwed up the subnet addresses (and the
masks)! I don't have your Visio file any more, and thus I can't
remember which of your networks has the x.y.5.0 address and which has
the x.y.0.0 address, but the fact that one of your subnet masks
includes the other (and similar network addresses), it's very likely
that your router lost track of what to do.
Actually, suppose you have the x.y.0.0 for your wired connection.
Using the subnet masks, you have:
x.y.0.0/255.255.252.0 ==> x.y.0.0 - x.y.3.255
x.y.5.0/255.255.192.0 ==> x.y.0.0 - x.y.63.255
You see, your wired connection is a part of your wireless
connections! You're not supposed to do that (please read network
reference book on this).
I really don't know why you have to specified two (supposedly)
different network addresses for your wired and wireless connections.
I mean, I've setup about 6 wifi routers, and none of them needs me to
do so. Both wired and wireless use the same network address and
network mask.
HTH
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:06 PM, paresh masani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm...You are right. We use different net-masks(255.255.252.0 for
> wired, 255.255.192.0 for wireless) for both wired and wire-less connections.
> And also default gateways are different for both. I think the main reason
> having this problem is because of two different access point. I could see
> that when I am taking VNC of machine using wire-less IP then destination
> machine showing incoming request saying SYN_RCVD state but I think it is
> replying to source machine via wired connection and source machine is
> rejecting the response as it did not send any packat to specified wired IP.
> What do you say? This might be problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Paresh
>
>
> On 6/23/08, Seak, Teng-Fong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I can't give you the answer since you didn't specify the subnet
>> mask used in your network.
>>
>> If I take it as 255.255.0.0, then yes, yours is the same as mine.
>> Well, almost, actually. The computer on which VNC viewer is running
>> only has wired connection; it has no wireless NIC.
>>
>> If I take it as 255.255.255.0, then no, they're different.
>>
>> Actually, I was talking about logical topology. Not physical
>> topology. And as a matter of fact, I don't think having one access
>> point or two access points would change anything.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:08 AM, paresh masani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for doing testing. Could you please make sure that the network
>> > topology you have tested and my network's topology(attached file) is
>> > same.
>> > Please check all the three cases and Please let me know if real VNC will
>> > work in all cases or not.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Paresh
>> _______________________________________________
>> VNC-List mailing list
>> VNC-List@realvnc.com
>> To remove yourself from the list visit:
>> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
