Hi Rich, I think there might have been a misunderstanding of my comment.
I'm not questioning whether the discussed topics are related to updating RFC 9325-I agree that they provide important rationale for the changes. My point is that the abstract and introduction should clearly state that these topics (such as post-quantum cryptography and TLS 1.2 vulnerabilities) are part of the discussion in this draft. This would provide better guidance to the reader upfront, making it clear that the document does more than just introduce the update-it also explains the reasoning/consequences behind it. This is just a suggestion to improve clarity and ensure the reader understands the full scope of the draft from the beginning. Best, Samier From: Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 4:41 PM To: Samier Barguil Giraldo (Nokia) <samier.barguil_gira...@nokia.com>; ops-...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13....@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; uta@ietf.org Subject: Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-06 You don't often get email from rs...@akamai.com<mailto:rs...@akamai.com>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. My comment was based on the observation that the document discusses several aspects beyond directly modifying RFC 9325, as it also provides broader guidance on related topics. I disagree. It modifies 9325 and then the rest of the document gives the rationale for those decisions. PQ is only one of the reasons. It gets its own detailed section because PQ is a common topic in the technical press these days. If the intent is both to update RFC 9325 and provide broader guidance, it might be helpful to clarify this in the introduction or abstract. I believe it cleanly updates 9325 and gives reasons for doing so. Also, have you had a chance to review the suggestions made by Med in the following PR? GitHub Link<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/richsalz/draft-use-tls13/pull/6/files__;!!GjvTz_vk!RfdPF6WxjEEjlm25JC7js_6GUIFsuoPGmPyuUDGtweXvNQJyPoeIbUEKrDdJFNirEHVzJWLUz00AjvtJYq1CcW0$>. Yes I have seen it, and I commented in the PR that I will merge it shortly.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
