Thanks for the review. - The Abstract states that this document updates RFC 9325. However, in Section 5, the changes are explained, but it is unclear whether the sole intent of this document is to introduce these updates or if it has a broader scope, as other related topics are also discussed. Can you give an example of something that is beyond the scope of updating 9325? I believe the other related topics are rationale and justification.
- In the following paragraph, does "these efforts" refer to the efforts of this draft specifically, or does it refer to broader cryptographic industry/technology efforts? "For TLS, it is important to note that the focus of these efforts is TLS 1.3 or later, and that TLS 1.2 will not be supported (see [TLS12FROZEN]). This is one more reason for new protocols to default to TLS 1.3, where PQC is actively being standardized, as this gives new applications the option to use PQC." Samier
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- uta@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to uta-le...@ietf.org
