Chair hat off, this suggestion makes sense to me, I would support making
the change, unless a strong counter argument is presented.

OS

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:54 AM Chris Lonvick <lonvick.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Viktor and all,
>
> I see your point.
>
> How about if the phrases "MUST NOT offer TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA" in
> Sections 4 and 5 be changed to "SHOULD NOT offer..."?
>
> This seems to be more consistent with Section 4.2.1 of RFC 9325 (BCP 195)
> and will continue to allow devices to offer that algorithm --and allow log
> messages to continue to be delivered during a transition.
>
> We're still looking for more reviews and discussion on this topic.
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 11:42 AM Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 07:16:01AM -0400, Chris Lonvick wrote:
>>
>> > We think that this version is ready for WG Last Call. Would the members
>> of
>> > the WG please review and let us know (on the WG list) if there are any
>> > objections?
>> >
>>
>> The draft looks clear enough.  My main concern is not with readyness,
>> but with the statement that the previous MTI ciphers MUST NOT be used.
>>
>> Such a radical compatibility break does not on the face of it look
>> justified.  It would I believe be sufficient to say that they MUST offer
>> and prefer the new MTI algorithms.  Which is enough to ensure an orderly
>> transition to the new algorithms, without breaking interoperability.
>>
>> The availability of logs can be more important than their
>> confidentiality in transit.
>>
>> --
>>     Viktor.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Uta mailing list
>> Uta@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>


-- 


ORIE STEELE
Chief Technology Officer
www.transmute.industries

<https://transmute.industries>
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to