On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 07:16:01AM -0400, Chris Lonvick wrote:
> We think that this version is ready for WG Last Call. Would the members of
> the WG please review and let us know (on the WG list) if there are any
> objections?
>
The draft looks clear enough. My main concern is not with readyness,
but with the statement that the previous MTI ciphers MUST NOT be used.
Such a radical compatibility break does not on the face of it look
justified. It would I believe be sufficient to say that they MUST offer
and prefer the new MTI algorithms. Which is enough to ensure an orderly
transition to the new algorithms, without breaking interoperability.
The availability of logs can be more important than their
confidentiality in transit.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
