Hello Chris, Thank you (to all authors) for bringing this forward. That effort is very much appreciated, specifically as we rely on it in work done in IEC on power system automation security.
I reviewed the latest version of the draft. I also reviewed earlier versions and the updated version describes the approach very well. I would like to second Rich here, it is very useful to have the reasoning for the changes included. I have no comments to the document. Best regards Steffen From: Uta <uta-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 1:16 PM To: uta@ietf.org Subject: [Uta] Reviews requested - draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog Hi, We think that this version is ready for WG Last Call. Would the members of the WG please review and let us know (on the WG list) if there are any objections? The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog/ There is also an htmlized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-uta-ciphersuites-in-sec-syslog-04 Many thanks, Chris
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
