On 7/5/22 8:44 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
I found the part "and a DNS domain name of apps.example.net." to beconfusing, as I initially read it as "the combination of an application service type ... and a DNS domain name of apps.example.net.", which is not the case according to the following sentence.So I suggest either removing this part, or changing it to something like " and, separately, a DNS domain name of apps.example.net.". Thanks for the feedback! Change made. I am about to merge that change, the other diffs we have discussed on the "Yaron" thread, and this change to meet the consensus called by the chairs: - Identifiers such as IP address are not discussed. In addition, the focus of + Identifiers such as IP address are not discussed. + Protocols other than HTTP may want to consider + {{HTTP-SEMANTICS, Section 4.3.5}} as a validation model. + In addition, the focus of I'm about to post a new version of the draft.
Thanks, Rich. At some point we should also fix the text about reg-name that Martin flagged (I just now proposed text in the GitHub issue):
https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/issues/55 Peter _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
