Hi,
My apologies for late response. I read the document and I generally
found it in a good state and thus support its publication. I have one
minor comment:
2nd paragraph of 6.4 reads:
These identifiers provide an application service type portion to be
checked, but that portion is combined only with the DNS domain name
portion of the SRV-ID or URI-ID itself. For example, if a client's
list of reference identifiers includes an SRV-ID of _xmpp-
client.im.example.org and a DNS-ID of apps.example.net, the client
MUST check both the combination of an application service type of
xmpp-client and a DNS domain name of im.example.org and a DNS domain
name of apps.example.net.
I found the part "and a DNS domain name of apps.example.net." to be
confusing, as I initially read it as "the combination of an application
service type ... and a DNS domain name of apps.example.net.", which is
not the case according to the following sentence.
So I suggest either removing this part, or changing it to something like
" and, separately, a DNS domain name of apps.example.net.".
However, the client MUST NOT check the
combination of an application service type of xmpp-client and a DNS
domain name of apps.example.net because it does not have an SRV-ID of
_xmpp-client.apps.example.net in its list of reference identifiers.
Hi,
this message starts a Working Group Last Call for
draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/
The WGLC will last for two weeks and will end June the 27th.
Please send your comments to the list before this date.
Regards,
Leif & Valery.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
