On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:42:08AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > > > On Feb 28, 2019, at 11:01 AM, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > > > > I have to agree with EKR about it not completely being the sender's > > decision, though for a rather different reason. I really doubt that > > in the vast majority of cases any human user will actively choose or > > not choose this option on a message-by-message basis. > > The primary motivation for "Require TLS = no" is to allow the user > to *resend" a message that is not getting through, or to reach the > destination domain's postmaster because of downstream (receiving > system misconfiguration), to send a message that requires no meaningful > confidentiality. Individual users are very well positioned to make
If those are the *primary motivation*s, then why does neither "resend" nor "postmaster" appear in the -07? -Benjamin _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
