On 2/28/19 8:28 AM, John Levine wrote: > In article > <CALaySJKdQziPJerfW9RJ_tExytaESjmfNMysRduYJ93z=ku...@mail.gmail.com> you > write: >> system requiring TLS for that message. My experience with working in >> organizations that use such markings is that they overuse them: the >> sending human doesn't actually determine the sensitivity; rather, the >> sending human becomes used to putting "Top Secret" on nearly >> everything, or "Confidential and Privileged", in the case of lawyers, >> on absolutely everything including, "Let's have lunch." > This is why I have never thought this thing makes sense. It's just > another bit of unenforcable threatening boilerplate that any sensible > recipient will ignore. As Jim knows, I've already implemented it in > my MTA with that interpretation in mind.
I suspect that your implementation has missed a few MUSTs in the specification :) _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
