Hi, > Designers of new application protocols developed through the > Internet > > Standards Process are expected to conform to the best practices > > recommended here, unless they provide documentation of compelling > > reasons that would prevent such conformance (e.g., widespread > > deployment on constrained devices that lack support for the > necessary > > algorithms). > > > > ### > > > > I somewhat fear that we're opening a can of worms with the final > > paragraph, but so be it. > > > > > > I am not against making this change - but let's recall that we already > > have had the IoT community utter serious concerns that the BCP might > > affect their efforts. It is not a straight-forward call to make. > > > > Ralph > > The idea of making best practice sorta-kinda normative makes me a bit > queasy. > > So.... do we really need any sort of language to express a hope or can we just keep it silent and see if developers of new protocols turn to the BCP for inspiration anyway, hope expressed or not? I think they would.
Ralph
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
