fraud unsubscribe me now

> On 02/18/2026 8:29 PM CST Chris Wozny <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
>  
> We're working on a two-channel phase interferometry application using an X410 
> with two ZBX daughterboards and am having difficulty achieving consistent 
> inter-channel phase measurements across application restarts. I'm hoping 
> someone on the list has experience with this and can point me in the right 
> direction. I've found quite a few emails on the mailing list from about a 
> year ago on the topic, but they didn't seem to have a resolution (as far as I 
> could tell).
>  
> Here's my current configuration:
> 
> NI USRP X410 (Rev 7)
> Two ZBX daughterboards
> MPM Version: 5.3
> FPGA Version: 8.3 (UC_200)
> FPGA git hash: c37b318.clean
>  
> I'm using UHD 4.7.0.0 with the Multi_USRP API in C++. The ports I'm connected 
> to are the RX1 SMA ports on the same daughterboard (A:0 and A:1). The X410 is 
> also connected to an external 10 MHz + 1 PPS reference from an Octoclock. I'm 
> feeding these receive ports with a pulsed waveform from a signal generator 
> connected via a splitter.
> 
> Problem:
> 
> Within a single execution of the application, the phase difference between 
> the two channels is extremely stable and consistent pulse-to-pulse. However, 
> when the application is restarted the phase offset changes to an essentially 
> arbitrary value. Across five consecutive runs we observed delta phase values 
> of approximately -25, -154, -25, 74, and -119 degrees at 3050 MHz.
>  
> The same code (timed command tune requests) and test equipment setup was 
> working with an X310. The phase differences were consistent over a period of 
> a few days of application restarts and power cycles. It seems like there are 
> some fundamental architectural differences between the X310 with two UBX-160s 
> and the X410 with two ZBXs that prevent the same task from being accomplished.
>  
> Here are the steps we've taken thus far to try and get the same initial phase 
> on both channels from one run of the application to another:
> 
> 1. Switched clock and time source to "external" to lock to the Octoclock's 10 
> MHz and 1 PPS reference and polled the ref_locked sensor before proceeding.
> 2. Used set_time_next_pps() rather than set_time_now() to latch device time 
> on a PPS edge, followed by a sleep longer than one second to guarantee the 
> latch has occurred.
> 3. Configured subdev spec (A:0 A:1), per-channel parameters (sample rate, 
> bandwidth, gain, antenna), and get_rx_stream() all after the ref_locked wait 
> and PPS latch.
> 4. Issued simultaneous tune commands to both channels using 
> set_command_time() aligned to the next PPS edge 
> (get_time_now().get_full_secs() + 1.0), followed by another sleep greater 
> than 1 second to allow LO lock.
> 5. Attempted explicit LO sharing via set_rx_lo_source("internal", 
> "LO1"/"LO2", chan) on both channels, however set_rx_lo_export_enabled() was 
> not supported on this radio so we abandoned that.
> 
> The within-run phase stability is excellent (sub-degree variation 
> pulse-to-pulse), which suggests the hardware is working correctly. The 
> problem appears to be that something is initializing to an arbitrary phase 
> state on each UHD session that is not being reset by any of the above steps.
> 
> The ultimate question we have: with an X410 and two ZBX daughterboards is 
> multi-channel phase coherence across multiple UHD sessions possible? If so, 
> are there any steps we might be missing or out of order from what we tried 
> above? Feeding in a known signal every time we start a session is not an 
> option.
>  
> There was some chatter in the mailing list about newer versions of UHD 
> resolving this, but other replies from March 2025 left it ambiguous (to me at 
> least) as to whether this was fixed for X410s or X440s or fixed at all.
>  
> Any guidance you all might provide is greatly appreciated!
>  
> Best,
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to