You mentioned a difference of 732ns. Is this a measured difference or is
this the difference in the timestamps contained in the metadata for the 2
streams?
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 5:23 PM <zackk...@utexas.edu> wrote:
> If I do thing concurrently (same thread, same rx_streamer) would that
> solve the timing issue? For example:
>
> stream_args.channels = { 0, 1};
>
> uhd::rx_streamer::sptr rx_stream = usrp_->get_rx_stream(stream_args);
>
> …
>
> size_t num_rx_samps =
>
> rx_stream->recv(buffs, samps_per_buff_, md, timeout,
> one_packet);
>
> Where buffs is a collection of receive buffers.
>
> It would become a little awkward with different sampling rates, but would
> this potentially solve the timing issue?
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
