Hello Bob,
Were you able to use more than one 10 GbE connection to transport
traffic that exceeds throughput of single SFP+ 10GbE interface?
I wasn't able to do that yet. This is the command that I execute to test it:
prefix/lib/uhd/examples/benchmark_rate --rx_subdev "A:0 B:0"
--rx_channels 0,1
--args="addr=192.168.10.2,second_addr=192.168.11.2,mgmt_addr=192.168.0.9"
--rx_rate 245.76e6 --rx_delay 4 --duration 10 --pps internal
--multi_streamer
In wireshark on the second interface I can see only UDP packets testing
MTU size and 3 first RFNoC management packets. And that's all. Only
first interface receives samples.
Best Regards,
Piotr Krysik
W dniu 15.06.2022 o 17:17, Tillson, Bob (US) via USRP-users pisze:
So I am on the x4_200 image and am wondering what the “correct” way to
setup the transport is.
I currently have a single qsfp28 connection on the x410 to a single
100 GbE port on a mellanox card.
Question #1:
Looking at the description of the fpga image it describes the x4_200
as “4 x 10GbE”, so should I really be configured as single qsfp28
connection on the x410 to a quad 10 GbE on host with a breakout cable?
I am seeing some wonkiness in my app, which was pretty stable on the
N310 and wondering if it could be due to my transport setup.
I am still investigating the app, but it made me think about how the
data is delivered from device to host.
Question #2:
With the x4_200 fpga image, is the traffic for each RF port “routed”
to a single 10GbE interface? 4 RF ports, 4 10GbE connections?
Any insights would be greatly appreciated J
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
