On 2022-01-14 10:07, Paul Atreides wrote:
Thanks Marcus, I’ve been scouring the Rubiks cube that is the knowledge base 
for about a week now. I’ve also watched the Dan Baker GRCON2019 talk and 
followed the references there as well.

The reference you linked is very helpful in a lot of cases, but in this one it 
doesnt address (anywhere I’ve seen) that in order to have the device operate 
with local oscillator sharing between RF 0 and RF 1, physically connecting the 
radio back to itself needs to be done. I’ve seen plenty of things about 
“external LO” but to me that term is a little confusing because it sounds like 
it’s external LO to the device.

I guess I was just thinking it might be a good idea to let N321 users know that 
in order to achieve phase coherence between INTERNAL channels, it’s going to be 
more work than a B210.

Just my 2 cents.


You should be able to get adequate phase-coherence in a single N321 without using LO-sharing at all--I THINK that the synthesizers support   phase-resynch on tuning, so if the tune commands are wrapped up in timed commands, you should get internal phase coherence without
  resorting to LO sharing.

But I don't have one of these in my collection, so I can't test that hypothesis...

_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to