Hi, thanks for the detailed explanation. On Sat, Dec 4, 2021, 08:38 Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com> wrote:
> Hello! > > > I want to know if I can use N200 with UBX160 > > Sadly, no. The N200 needs an anti-alias filter of at most 50 MHz bandwidth > (one-sided) for > effectively alias-free operation, and a UBX160 has 80 MHz. > > > My goal is to run the N200 at 100Msps to receive 100MHz bandwidth of > signal. > > That is impossible. The N200 has a master clock rate of 100 MHz, that is > true, but it's > impossible to get that amount of data out of the N200 (the Ethernet is > much too slow for > it, and there's no significant memory on the N200 to store it). > > > Which means that UBX40 is not the right choice. > > More importantly, the N200 is not the right choice! > > > I don't see the UBX160 on the recommended compatible products of N > series devices > > Correct! > > > But I've found out the datasheet of UBX160 specified that UBX160 is > compatible with > both X and N series. > > Oh, that is indeed an error in the datasheet! Thank you for pointing this > out to us! > > > So, will this combination work? > > No; if you want 100 MHz bandwidth, you will need a X300/X310 with a > UBX160, or a USRP > N300/N310/N320/N321 or X400 alone. I'd personally go for X300+UBX160, > which is probably > the most cost-effective solution. > > Best regards, > > Marcus Müller > > > DISCLAIMER: Any attached Code is provided As Is. It has not been tested or > validated as a product, for use in a deployed application or system, or for > use in hazardous environments. You assume all risks for use of the Code. > Use of the Code is subject to terms of the licenses to the UHD or RFNoC > code with which the Code is used. Standard licenses to UHD and RFNoC can be > found at https://www.ettus.com/sdr-software/licenses/. > > NI will only perform services based on its understanding and condition > that the goods or services (i) are not for the use in the production or > development of any item produced, purchased, or ordered by any entity with > a footnote 1 designation in the license requirement column of Supplement > No. 4 to Part 744, U.S. Export Administration Regulations and (ii) such a > company is not a party to the transaction. If our understanding is > incorrect, please notify us immediately because a specific authorization > may be required from the U.S. Commerce Department before the transaction > may proceed further. > > On 03.12.21 08:34, 翁偉吾 wrote: > > Hi, I want to know if I can use N200 with UBX160. My goal is to run the > N200 at 100Msps > > to receive 100MHz bandwidth of signal. Which means that UBX40 is not > the right choice. > > I don't see the UBX160 on the recommended compatible products of N > series devices. But > > I've found out the datasheet of UBX160 specified that UBX160 is > compatible with both X > > and N series. So, will this combination work? Is there going to be some > aliasing issue? > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
