Hi Jason, You could try running the new 3.15 MPM based file system for the E310, but it has some caveats, more details here: http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2019-May/059897.html
Regards, Nate Temple On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:05 PM Jason Matusiak < ja...@gardettoengineering.com> wrote: > OK, this is actually an E310 problem. The E310 always looks off device > first. A coworker reminded me that we spent a couple days years > back trying to figure out why the device was asking like it was working, > but we weren't seeing any results. It was because it was actually talking > to an N2xx on the network even with the IP address arg. > > > We never found a solution (using both the 127 and 192 address as an > argument still causes issues). So, it would be nice to clean this up on > the E310 at some point, but for now I will try not to mix the E310 and > E320 on the same subnet. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jason Matusiak > *Sent:* Friday, June 7, 2019 12:41 PM > *To:* Nate Temple > *Cc:* Marcus D Leech; Philip Balister; Ettus Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] E320 hogging the network > > > OK, maybe based on my last email (which crossed yours I think). The addr > flag doesn't seem to work at all with the uhd_usrp_probe on the E310 (at > least my version). > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Nate Temple <nate.tem...@ettus.com> > *Sent:* Friday, June 7, 2019 12:37 PM > *To:* Jason Matusiak > *Cc:* Marcus D Leech; Philip Balister; Ettus Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] E320 hogging the network > > Hi Jason, > > For what its worth, I haven't personally ran this exact combo (E310 w/ UHD > 3.11 and E320 w/ 3.14) on the same subnet, but I have ran two N320's on the > same subnet (192.168.10.2 and 192.168.10.3, both with 3.14). I did run into > the issue where probing in embedded mode would pickup the other device > first, but when providing a localhost addr, it worked as expected. I could > use both devices from a common host in network mode. > > Trying the E320/E310 on different subnets would be worth a try. > > I'll open an internal issue on our bug tracker for this, there is likely > improvements we can make to the device discovery. > > > Regards, > Nate Temple > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:22 AM Jason Matusiak < > ja...@gardettoengineering.com> wrote: > > Howdy. > > > Nope, but it fails in a weird way. I disconnected the E320 to make sure > this issue wasn't due to it, but it still acts the same. > > > If I run: uhd_usrp_probe --args "addr=127.0.0.1" > > *root@ettus-e3xx-sg3:~# uhd_usrp_probe --args "addr=127.0.0.1" * > *[INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.0; Boost_106400; > UHD_3.11.0.1-0-unknown* > *Error: i2c_zc_impl recv timeout* > > > Reading up on the USRP2, they specifically say that you need to be on > different subnets if you are using more than on device. I wonder if this > is the case here too? > https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_usrp2.html#usrp2_network_multidev > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Nate Temple <nate.tem...@ettus.com> > *Sent:* Friday, June 7, 2019 12:17 PM > *To:* Jason Matusiak > *Cc:* Marcus D Leech; Philip Balister; Ettus Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] E320 hogging the network > > Hi Jason, > > On the E310, if you pass the device arg addr with 127.0.0.1 does it work > as expected? > > uhd_usrp_probe --args "addr=127.0.0.1" > > > Regards, > Nate Temple > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:10 AM Jason Matusiak via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > > Darn, I was hoping that was it, but I don't think so. > > > Here is the result from my E310: > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:2F:25:44:46 > > and now the E320: > > sfp0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:2F:24:C2:FB > > If I ping each device on my host, then run arp, I see this (the mac > addresses match up correctly): > > Address HWtype HWaddress Flags Mask > Iface > 192.168.10.45 ether 00:80:2f:24:c2:fb C > p4p1 > 192.168.10.95 ether 00:80:2f:25:44:46 C > p4p1 > > I figured that that would be fine though because I have the same issue > when I am running commands ON my E310. And if it was a routing issue, it > would mean that both my machine and the E310 and the E320 were being > screwed up. > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Marcus D Leech <patchvonbr...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, June 7, 2019 12:01 PM > *To:* Jason Matusiak > *Cc:* Philip Balister; Ettus Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] E320 hogging the network > > Check the MAC addresses. > > I know that on some ARM platforms that has to be programmed in at boot and > perhaps these system images have it set to the same value. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 7, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Jason Matusiak via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > > Philip, > > > They have unique addresses (10.95 and 10.45). It is really weird that > when I am on the E310, and set the ip-addr to himself, that he would even > look off the device.... > > > They both have hostnames and they are not similar to each other at all. > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> > *Sent:* Friday, June 7, 2019 11:10 AM > *To:* Jason Matusiak; Ettus Mail List > *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] E320 hogging the network > > Check each ones ip address, likely by running ifconfig. In the back of > my mind, I recall something like this in the E100 days. Do they have the > same hostname? > > Philip > > On 06/07/2019 07:37 AM, Jason Matusiak via USRP-users wrote: > > It looks like I am misunderstanding something with how the E320 handles > the network. > > > > > > I have my E320 on my subnet with the sfp0 assigned to 10.45 (instead of > the default 10.2). I can ssh into it and things seem to run fine in > embedded mode. > > > > > > Now, if I ssh onto an E312 that is on the same network (IP 10.95), it > doesn't work right as long as the E320 is plugged in. When I do a probe or > run any other UHD-type commands on the E310, it seems to always talk to the > E320 first and it screws everything up. It doesn't matter if I put the > E310's address into the command or not, the E320 responds. I also remember > seeing this occur when I was on my host machine running commands (the E320 > bullied its way into being the main attraction). > > > > > > My current work-around is to unplug Ethernet from the E320, run my > command on the E310, plug back into the E320, then run its command. This > seems to allow things to work as I intended, but is obviously not ideal and > is fairly difficult to do when devices are remote. > > > > > > So what am I missing here? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > USRP-users mailing list > > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > USRP-users Info Page - Ettus > <http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com> > lists.ettus.com > To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the USRP-users > Archives.. Using USRP-users: To post a message to all the list members, > send email to usrp-users@lists.ettus.com. You can subscribe to the list, > or change your existing subscription, in the sections below. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
