Thanks Neel, I will keep an eye out for updates.

________________________________
From: Neel Pandeya <neel.pand...@ettus.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 4, 2019 1:23 AM
To: Jason Matusiak
Cc: Ettus Mail List; Chris Gobbett
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] E320 numpy missing?

Hello Jason and Chris:

I understand your frustration. We are working on instructions for adding GNU 
Radio support to the E320, and we will provide you with a filesystem. We should 
have something ready for you by the middle of next week. I can be your 
point-of-contact on this issue, and feel free to contact me directly. I will 
make a follow-on post as well to update the mailing list.

--Neel Pandeya



On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 08:07, Jason Matusiak via USRP-users 
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>> wrote:
Chris,

It is a shame that the E320 doesn't seem to have complete support, but maybe 
someone from Ettus will chime in at some point (though it has already been over 
a month since you posted).  As of now, these are paperweights in our office and 
I have to switch gears to a different project with a different vendor until it 
gets updated.  I am not sure who we can even ping at Ettus on the embedded 
front in case they aren't monitoring the mailing list.  Do you have a contact 
there on the embedded side?

You don't happen to have a series of steps posted somewhere that you use to try 
to get the E320 to a usable state do you?



________________________________
From: USRP-users 
<usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users-boun...@lists.ettus.com>> 
on behalf of Chris Gobbett via USRP-users 
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 9:21 PM
To: Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] E320 numpy missing?

I've had similar problems since this post in March, and still waiting on a 
'clean' way forward
http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2019-March/059332.html

In the interim I've done lots of cross-compiling and also stealing 
libraries/binaries from working E310 images; many of the included binaries seem 
gimped or a step down from what was on the E310.

----- Original Message -----
From:
"Jason Matusiak" 
<ja...@gardettoengineering.com<mailto:ja...@gardettoengineering.com>>

To:
"Philip Balister" <phi...@balister.org<mailto:phi...@balister.org>>, "Ettus 
Mail List" <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>>
Cc:

Sent:
Wed, 1 May 2019 14:40:16 +0000
Subject:
Re: [USRP-users] E320 numpy missing?


I just double-checked and ENABLE_PYTHON is on in my system (which was 
apparently the default since I didn't spell it out in my cmake command).

________________________________
From: Jason Matusiak
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 10:36 AM
To: Philip Balister; Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] E320 numpy missing?

I actually was using a .sh file from earlier in April, but pulling down the 
most recent: e3xx_e320_sdk_default-v3.13.0.2-20190415.zip, I still don't see 
pretty much any site-packages in the sysroot.

Those things seem to be there automatically when using the .sh info with the 
e310 files.

I will try including python in the cmake path (which I've never needed to do 
before), but is that going to be enough?  I feel like the back-and-forth you 
and I had last year with the rocko build for the E310 were for pretty similar 
issues.  But honestly, I need to look back at the emails for the exact issues 
at the time.

________________________________
From: Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org<mailto:phi...@balister.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 10:31 AM
To: Jason Matusiak; Ettus Mail List
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] E320 numpy missing?

On 05/01/2019 09:55 AM, Jason Matusiak via USRP-users wrote:
> I also get a "ImportError: No module named sip" when I try to run: 
> uhd_siggen_gui
>
> So I think a few things might be missing from the cross-compile setup.

I took a few minutes and looked at the current state of the BSP. It
looks like you might have this image:

https://github.com/EttusResearch/meta-ettus/blob/master/meta-ettus-core/recipes-core/images/developer-image.bb

I forget where numpy is the gnuradio dependency tree, but I'm going to
guess if you enable python support in gnuradio (yes it might be possible
to use gnuradio without python) you will need numpy to build/run.

Philip

>
> ________________________________
> From: Jason Matusiak
> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 8:46 AM
> To: Ettus Mail List
> Subject: E320 numpy missing?
>
> Finally got my E320 in and I cross-compiled a new setup.  I tried to fire up 
> my flowgraph (which works fine on an E310) and it is complaining about numpy 
> missing.
>
> If I do a search from / on the E320, the only numpy that is showing up is:
> /usr/include/boost/python/numpy
>
> If I do a search from a good E310 in / I see:
> ./usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy
> ./usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy
> ./usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Cython/Includes/numpy
> ./usr/include/boost/python/numpy
>
>
> Back on the host machine, my E320 cross-compile prefix shows numpy:
> ./sysroots/cortexa9hf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/boost/python/numpy
>
> My good E310 prefix shows:
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/src/debug/python-numpy/1.13.1-r0/numpy-1.13.1/build/src.linux-x86_64-2.7/numpy
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/src/debug/python-numpy/1.13.1-r0/numpy-1.13.1/build/src.linux-x86_64-2.7/numpy/core/include/numpy
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/src/debug/python-numpy/1.13.1-r0/numpy-1.13.1/numpy
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/src/debug/python-numpy/1.13.1-r0/numpy-1.13.1/numpy/core/include/numpy
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Cython/Includes/numpy
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy
> ./sysroots/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/boost/python/numpy
>
> So, was numpy forgotten?  Left out for a reason?  I am going to attempt to 
> build it by hand, but I have a fear that I am going to go down dependency 
> hell with this and other missing packages that GR might want.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:USRP-users@lists.ettus.com>
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to