Hi Jonathan, Just following up on this. I have switched to the UHD 3.13 release + FPGA version 5.2. This issue still persists.
Is it possible that a change to UHD could be causing this to not work? If anyone can confirm that they are able to send commands to the radio block from an rfnoc block in recent versions of UHD it would help a lot. Thanks, Sam On Oct 22, 2018, 1:06 PM -0700, Samuel Prager <spra...@usc.edu>, wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Yes I add my block and the radio block, connect them and tell my block to > send commands to radio block. I have confirmed today that the simulation > still works correctly in Vivado 2017.4 — the settings registers are written > as expected, an rx command is generated in the radio and the correct number > of samples are streamed back into the tb_streamer. > > Sam > On Oct 21, 2018, 9:20 AM -0700, Jon Pendlum <jon.pend...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > How does your testbench work? Do you add the radio core block, send timed > > commands to it, and see the outputs toggle? > > > > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 1:05 PM Samuel Prager <spra...@usc.edu> wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathon, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the response! Yes I’m using ce_clk and ce_rst. Thanks for > > > > sharing your code — the only real difference I see is that you > > > > increment the seq_num. I am leaving it as 12’b0 — could this be causing > > > > an issue? > > > > > > > > I should also say that In my case, the command packets are being sent > > > > to the radio block to trigger timed receive commands in order to reduce > > > > the number of software sr_writes. > > > > > > > > Here’s my code just in case: https://pastebin.com/Asgj7Jw2. > > > > > > > > This is something that was simulated/verified and worked in the past, > > > > but perhaps a change has been made that prevents this from working? > > > > > > > > I will try a release tag as soon as possible — however this is > > > > something I’ve been seeing for a couple of months now that has kept me > > > > on pre-2017.4 releases. > > > > > > > > Sam > > > > On Oct 19, 2018, 8:17 PM -0700, Jon Pendlum <jon.pend...@gmail.com>, > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Sam, > > > > > > > > > > I am using command packets to tune the DDC block's DSP frequency. Are > > > > > you using ce_clk and ce_rst for clock and reset? Here is my code if > > > > > you want to take a look: https://pastebin.com/1AeHFb0J. Also, it > > > > > might be worth trying your code on a release tag like v3.13.0.2 in > > > > > case master has a regression. > > > > > > > > > > Jonathon > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 8:11 AM Samuel Prager via USRP-users > > > > > > <usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an RFNoC block that generates command packets to write > > > > > > > settings registers of the downstream connected block using the > > > > > > > Control Source (cmdout_tdata) of the noc_shell . Previously this > > > > > > > had worked perfectly (prior to approximately d6b2283 on > > > > > > > rfnoc-devel), for both the X300 and E310, but this functionality > > > > > > > appears to perhaps be broken in the more recent FPGA releases — > > > > > > > since around the switch to Vivado 2017.4 and the move of the noc > > > > > > > block clock domain crossing to axi_wrapper.v). I have tried the > > > > > > > latest master branch (4f25ed1) with no success. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this a known issue? Can anyone shed light on what might have > > > > > > > caused this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The control packets are generated in my block as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wire eob = 1’b0; > > > > > > > wire [1:0] pkt_type = 2'b10; > > > > > > > wire [11:0] seqnum = 12'd0; // don't care > > > > > > > wire [15:0] payload_length = 16'd16; //don't care (payload length > > > > > > > in bytes) > > > > > > > assign cmd_tdata = {24’d0,set_bus_addr[7:0], set_bus_val[31:0]}; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cvita_hdr_encoder cvita_hdr_encoder( > > > > > > > .pkt_type(pkt_type),.eob(eob), .has_time(1'b0), > > > > > > > .seqnum(seqnum), > > > > > > > .payload_length(payload_length), > > > > > > > .src_sid(src_sid), .dst_sid(dst_sid), > > > > > > > .vita_time(vita_time), > > > > > > > .header(cmd_tuser) > > > > > > > ); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chdr_framer #(.SIZE(FIFO_SIZE), .WIDTH(64)) chdr_framer ( > > > > > > > .clk(clk), .reset(reset), .clear(clear), > > > > > > > .i_tdata(cmd_tdata), .i_tuser(cmd_tuser), .i_tlast(cmd_tlast), > > > > > > > .i_tvalid(cmd_tvalid), .i_tready(cmd_tready), > > > > > > > .o_tdata(cmdout_tdata), .o_tlast(cmdout_tlast), > > > > > > > .o_tvalid(cmdout_tvalid), .o_tready(cmdout_tready)); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The command packets appear to never reach the destination rfnoc > > > > > > > block, but I am at a loss for the cause. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is anyone currently using the control source functionality of the > > > > > > > noc_shell? I would really appreciate any pointers on how to fix > > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > USRP-users mailing list > > > > > > > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > > > > > > > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
