Hey Steve You could also skip ZMQ and just use shared files of samples using a VM in however you deem is the best way for your application.
On Wed, May 30, 2018, 14:54 Keith k, <keithko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Steve > > Do you have to use 2 computers? Can you run linux with a windows VM for > processing? Your ZMQ performance of piping samples within the same computer > may be faster and more deterministic, but may not work for your situation. > Also, Ive used ZMQ lots. I recommend using ROUTER/DEALER or DEALER/DEALER > architecture. Its worked the best for me. > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018, 10:05 shachar J. brown via USRP-users, < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > >> Hi Marcus, >> >> Thanks for replying. >> >> To make the story short - I am trying to collaborate with a colleague of >> mine. He has some serious signal processing capabilities on his Windows PC >> and I would like to extract the data for him from the X310 (with some minor >> processing). His tools don't work well under Linux environment. >> >> If I use a local router, which is connected to the X310 and two computers >> alone (and NOT to the web) - do you think that would solve anything? >> >> Thanks again, >> Steve >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com >> > wrote: >> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> > Do you know what is the max rate of data possible to send via xmlrcp >>> > / zmq / dpu socket? >>> >>> Speed is mostly a function of your connection , not of the protocol, so >>> there can't be a definite answer. I'd recommend just considering the >>> overhead of any sensibly packaged piece of samples as "small", and then >>> add a solid oversizing (2×?), because internet connections aren't >>> deterministic. >>> >>> > Which of the three options is more efficient? >>> >>> The three are pretty different; XMLRPC certainly is least well-fitting >>> to transport samples. I'd go with the ZMQ. >>> >>> > (BTW, is it possible to connect the X310's ethernet cable to the >>> > internet and control it remotely, or do I have to connect it directly >>> > to a host computer?) >>> >>> Directly to a host computer; while, in theory, the X310 is a pretty IP- >>> standards conformant networking device, I simply can't, on very many >>> levels, recommend exposing one to the internet. Also, the latency over >>> an internet connection is completely unusable for UHD. >>> >>> Can you please describe your use case, and the kind of internet >>> connection you have? I feel like you're trying to implement something >>> that will, simply by virtue of the math behind it, relatively hard, and >>> it might be helpful to give you early feedback on the concept. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Marcus >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> USRP-users mailing list >> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >> >
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
