Hello MarcusOkay. I gave your suggestions a try. Using Network manager, I 
edited the existing connection settings, to manual, changed the  the IP4 
address to 192.168.10.3 and the netmask to 255.255.255.0 and left the gateway 
address blank. After making these changes I restarted the VM and proceeded to 
try to ping the N210 only to get the same result as before, host unreachable. 
You mentioned before  to pick a virtualized network card that is gigabit 
capable. How exactly could I ensure that I've done this??
Tellrell  

    On Sunday, October 8, 2017 11:38 AM, Marcus Müller via USRP-users 
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
 

  Hi Tellrell, we should probably change the manual to say "If you're not using 
NetworkManager, do …". 
  If you're actually using NetworkManager inside that VM (chances are high!), 
instead of trxing to "sudo ifconfig…", just set up your network interface to a 
static IP Address with the right subnet through the graphical networking 
dialogue of the Linux Distro inside the VM. Note that it's also crucial that 
you pick a virtualized network card to be "emulated" inside the VM that is 
gigabit capable. Also note that unless you really know what you're doing, 
performance-wise, it's not recommended to do SDR hardware interfacing inside a 
VM; the additional layer of hardware virtualization (as you notice) doesn't 
make things easier, nor faster. But in general, with a good virtualized network 
card and bridged ethernet, yes, things should work.
  Best regards, Marcus
  
 On 10/08/2017 08:05 AM, Tellrell White via USRP-users wrote:
  
  Ken 
  I tried your first suggestion. I went into the configuration options and 
changed the network adapter to "bridged". Now there's a checkbox underneath the 
bridged option which says "Replicate Physical Connection Network State", I'm 
totally sure what this options, but I left it unchecked. After changing the 
network adapter to bridged i restarted the virtual machine and then followed 
the instructions on the UHD & USRP manual stating to set up a static ip on the 
host use the following command , sudo ifconfig <interface> 192.168.10.1. For 
interface, I used eth0 for my configuration. Then i ran ifconfig to see if this 
changed my ip address. The results are attached below. Then, I proceeded to try 
to ping the device. This resulted in me getting the same results as before, 
"host unreacheable", as shown in the other attachment below. Do I need to go 
into the /interfaces file and change the ip that way? And is there anything 
else I may be neglecting to do to fix this issue? 
  Tellrell
   
 
      On Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:36 AM, Ken M Erney 
<gsmmobile...@gmail.com> wrote:
  
 
   Hi Tellrell, 
  I am using virtual box but I have used VMWare Fusion as well and both have 
the option to specify that the network adapter should be bridged.  I am not a 
network guy, so I cant offer any advice regarding the alias approach you 
mention.  What I do know regarding my setup is that when its configured in 
bridged mode, the adapter on the VM will show up  on your network as another 
machine and not be NAT’d behind the VMWare client.  So for VMWare Fusion (OSX) 
and virtual box, there is a setting in the guest configuration that allows you 
to specify if the adapter is NAT’d, bridged, host only, etc.  In that config, 
specify bridged.  Once the OS boots, you can then go into the Ubuntu network 
config and configure the adapter with a manually assigned IP (i.e. not DHCP). 
In my case, I modified the interfaces file in ubuntu to use a static IP 
(192.168.10.5) and subnet  (255.255.255.1).  No gateway.  It then worked 
without issue. 
  Another option is to change the IP of the N210 to a fixed address on your 
real network.  The N210 won’t do DHCP but you can usually reserve and IP on 
your network and then just burn it into the N210.  Then on the guest OS config 
side, also specify bridged mode and let your network DHCP assign an IP to the 
guest.  It should work that way as well. 
  Give that you are using an alias, it would seem that this would do the same 
thing as what I am describing.  What we need is somebody with network 
experience to chime in here.  Oh one thing… when you say “alias” are you 
referring to setting this in the hosts file on ubuntu?  That may not work the 
same way, but I don’t know.  One other thing is to make sure that IP tables or 
the ubuntu firewall is turned off.  You CAN run a firewall on Ubuntu and still 
support the N210, but turning it off for right now would make sure that it is 
not interfering with the comms. 
  Also, when running the uhd_find_devices… try calling it and passing it the ip 
address of your N210… just in case. 
  - ken 
  
  
  On Oct 6, 2017, at 11:31 PM, Tellrell White via USRP-users 
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: 
    Ken I'm using vmware. Not sure if you used the same client but how exactly  
did you configure your vm to bridged. Also, I used the command to set an alias 
ip to 192.168.10.1  which is in the same subnet as the N210, not sure if thats 
different  from the manual approach you're suggesting. 
  Tellrell  
 
      On Friday, October 6, 2017 10:32 PM, Ken M Erney <gsmmobile...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
  
 
     What are you using as the VM software client  (e.g. VMware, virtual box, 
etc.). I was able to get mine to work but I had to configure my VM eth as  
"bridged". I also set it with a manually configured ip in the  same subnet as 
the N210. 
  - ken 
 On Oct 6, 2017 10:23 PM, "Tellrell  White via USRP-users" 
<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
 
    Hello Guys. 
  I'm currently trying to connect to the N210 using an ubuntu 14.04  virtual 
machine. I've tried the commands uhd_find_devices  and also uhd_usrp_probe and 
they both indicate "no devices found".  Pinging 192.168.2 comes up empty as 
well. I used the command sudo ip address add 192.168.10.1/255.255.255.0 dev 
eth0 to set the ip of the virtual machine. I'm connected to  the internet via 
wi-fi. The version of UHD i'm using is 3.10.2. Any  help is greatly 
appreciated. 
  
  Regards Tellrell
     
______________________________ _________________
 USRP-users mailing list
 USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
 http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_ lists.ettus.com
 
 
  
      
 
      _______________________________________________
 USRP-users mailing list
 USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
   
  
    
 
      
  
 _______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
 
 
 _______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com


   
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to