Have an offline discussion with Jongyoul and other Apache members, given Zeppelin is still in the '0.x' version range, breaking changes across feature versions are acceptable, and this feature is rarely adopted, we prefer to remove all codes in the next release directly, and we can recover if the better version is contributed.
Thanks, Cheng Pan > On Sep 10, 2024, at 17:23, Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Given that it is a released feature that might be adopted by some users, > deprecating it before removing is a fair decision, let me mark it deprecated > in 0.12 and remove it in the next version. > > Thanks, > Cheng Pan > >> 2024年8月25日 17:01，Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> 写道： >> >> Hello, >> >> I think we can decide to deprecate this feature. >> >> @Cheng, >> Could you please lead to handle this issue? >> >> Best regards, >> JL >> >> 2024년 7월 26일 (금) 오전 11:46, Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >>> >>> Thanks for information, let me extend this thread to user listing as well >>> to see if there are users using it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Cheng Pan >>> >>>> On Jul 24, 2024, at 11:41, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Cheng, >>>> >>>> Thank you for starting this discussion. >>>> >>>> For history, we already discussed before but there was a user to use >>>> this feature. Thus we couldn't retire this feature at that time. (It's >>>> been several years ago.) >>>> >>>> Lack of resources to maintain this feature, so it'd be better to find >>>> another way to provide a multi-instance feature instead it. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jongyoul >>>> >>>> 2024년 7월 24일 (수) 오후 12:28, Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Zeppelin users and developers, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to discuss the future of ZEPPELIN-3471 - raft-based zeppelin >>>>> cluster feature. >>>>> >>>>> It was proposed in 2018 and the initial version shipped in Zeppelin >>>>> v0.9.0, but unfortunately, the feature was not completed and was not >>>>> maintained after the first delivered version. Additionally, there are >>>>> a few reports(ZEPPELIN-5245, ZEPPELIN-5246) from the user that the >>>>> feature does not work properly. >>>>> >>>>> From the developer perspective, I found the selected raft >>>>> implementation library was dead[2], and some users also left concerns >>>>> about the CVEs involved in this library (see ZEPPELIN-5630). And the >>>>> introduced dependencies significantly increased the packaging time of >>>>> the zeppelin-interpreter-shaded module. >>>>> >>>>> Given the tight developer resource of the Zeppelin community, I think >>>>> we can consider removing this feature if no volunteer is willing to >>>>> continue to maintain it. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know your thoughts, thanks in advance. >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/atomix/atomix-archive >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Cheng Pan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Jongyoul Lee >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Jongyoul Lee >
