Given that it is a released feature that might be adopted by some users, deprecating it before removing is a fair decision, let me mark it deprecated in 0.12 and remove it in the next version.
Thanks, Cheng Pan > 2024年8月25日 17:01，Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Hello, > > I think we can decide to deprecate this feature. > > @Cheng, > Could you please lead to handle this issue? > > Best regards, > JL > > 2024년 7월 26일 (금) 오전 11:46, Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >> >> Thanks for information, let me extend this thread to user listing as well to >> see if there are users using it. >> >> Thanks, >> Cheng Pan >> >>> On Jul 24, 2024, at 11:41, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Cheng, >>> >>> Thank you for starting this discussion. >>> >>> For history, we already discussed before but there was a user to use >>> this feature. Thus we couldn't retire this feature at that time. (It's >>> been several years ago.) >>> >>> Lack of resources to maintain this feature, so it'd be better to find >>> another way to provide a multi-instance feature instead it. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jongyoul >>> >>> 2024년 7월 24일 (수) 오후 12:28, Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >>>> >>>> Hi Zeppelin users and developers, >>>> >>>> I'd like to discuss the future of ZEPPELIN-3471 - raft-based zeppelin >>>> cluster feature. >>>> >>>> It was proposed in 2018 and the initial version shipped in Zeppelin >>>> v0.9.0, but unfortunately, the feature was not completed and was not >>>> maintained after the first delivered version. Additionally, there are >>>> a few reports(ZEPPELIN-5245, ZEPPELIN-5246) from the user that the >>>> feature does not work properly. >>>> >>>> From the developer perspective, I found the selected raft >>>> implementation library was dead[2], and some users also left concerns >>>> about the CVEs involved in this library (see ZEPPELIN-5630). And the >>>> introduced dependencies significantly increased the packaging time of >>>> the zeppelin-interpreter-shaded module. >>>> >>>> Given the tight developer resource of the Zeppelin community, I think >>>> we can consider removing this feature if no volunteer is willing to >>>> continue to maintain it. >>>> >>>> Please let me know your thoughts, thanks in advance. >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/atomix/atomix-archive >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Cheng Pan >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Jongyoul Lee >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Jongyoul Lee
