Hello,

I think we can decide to deprecate this feature.

@Cheng,
Could you please lead to handle this issue?

Best regards,
JL

2024년 7월 26일 (금) 오전 11:46, Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>
> Thanks for information, let me extend this thread to user listing as well to 
> see if there are users using it.
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan
>
> > On Jul 24, 2024, at 11:41, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Cheng,
> >
> > Thank you for starting this discussion.
> >
> > For history, we already discussed before but there was a user to use
> > this feature. Thus we couldn't retire this feature at that time. (It's
> > been several years ago.)
> >
> > Lack of resources to maintain this feature, so it'd be better to find
> > another way to provide a multi-instance feature instead it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jongyoul
> >
> > 2024년 7월 24일 (수) 오후 12:28, Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
> >>
> >> Hi Zeppelin users and developers,
> >>
> >> I'd like to discuss the future of ZEPPELIN-3471 - raft-based zeppelin
> >> cluster feature.
> >>
> >> It was proposed in 2018 and the initial version shipped in Zeppelin
> >> v0.9.0, but unfortunately, the feature was not completed and was not
> >> maintained after the first delivered version. Additionally, there are
> >> a few reports(ZEPPELIN-5245, ZEPPELIN-5246) from the user that the
> >> feature does not work properly.
> >>
> >> From the developer perspective, I found the selected raft
> >> implementation library was dead[2], and some users also left concerns
> >> about the CVEs involved in this library (see ZEPPELIN-5630). And the
> >> introduced dependencies significantly increased the packaging time of
> >> the zeppelin-interpreter-shaded module.
> >>
> >> Given the tight developer resource of the Zeppelin community, I think
> >> we can consider removing this feature if no volunteer is willing to
> >> continue to maintain it.
> >>
> >> Please let me know your thoughts, thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/atomix/atomix-archive
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Cheng Pan
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Jongyoul Lee
>


-- 
Best regards,
Jongyoul Lee

Reply via email to