Dola Woolfe wrote: > Exactly right. > > I produce my static content programmatically. > Many pages are too complex to be generated otherwise. > Also, I get to write java not html. > When I want to change a font, I do it in one place not 1000 places.
[wince] Are we to assume that you're not able to use Server Side Includes or Cascading Style Sheets on this site? The font tag and most of the other presentational elements have been discouraged, if not deprecated, for about a decade. If you're using JSP to generate static pages instead of using the above technologies then you're making your life unnecessarily difficult. p > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Hassan Schroeder <hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Hassan Schroeder <hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: .html pages as .jsp pages >> To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 5:04 PM >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ken >> Bowen <kbo...@als.com> >> wrote: >>> Yes, but why the need to use the .jsp extension? A >> static site would run >>> just fine with everything as .html under >>> either Tomcat or httpd or .... >> Missing the point -- we're talking about static >> *deployment* of a >> dynamically *generated* site. >> >> -- >> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
