On May 14, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Dola Woolfe wrote:
Exactly right.
I produce my static content programmatically.
Many pages are too complex to be generated otherwise.
Also, I get to write java not html.
When I want to change a font, I do it in one place not 1000 places.
well, that should be done in CSS :)
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Hassan Schroeder <[email protected]>
wrote:
From: Hassan Schroeder <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: .html pages as .jsp pages
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 5:04 PM
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ken
Bowen <[email protected]>
wrote:
Yes, but why the need to use the .jsp extension? A
static site would run
just fine with everything as .html under
either Tomcat or httpd or ....
Missing the point -- we're talking about static
*deployment* of a
dynamically *generated* site.
--
Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
