Exactly right. I produce my static content programmatically. Many pages are too complex to be generated otherwise. Also, I get to write java not html. When I want to change a font, I do it in one place not 1000 places.
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Hassan Schroeder <hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Hassan Schroeder <hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: .html pages as .jsp pages > To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 5:04 PM > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Ken > Bowen <kbo...@als.com> > wrote: > > Yes, but why the need to use the .jsp extension? A > static site would run > > just fine with everything as .html under > > either Tomcat or httpd or .... > > Missing the point -- we're talking about static > *deployment* of a > dynamically *generated* site. > > -- > Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
