HiveMind always had negative connotations in my mind as well. I say de-emphasize Tapestry in Tapestry-IoC. Just call it IoC.
I hate Spring myself, and anything that gets people off it is a good thing IMHO On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Daniel Jue wrote: > I'd say keep the same name but market the IOC more heavily, with tutorials > and demos (a quickstart, perhaps) of it being used in a non web app. (I > don't think this is out there, right? If it is, it wasn't in-my-face > enough. :-) ) A T5 IOC quickstart might work well with an Apache Shiro > example, since that can also be used outside of a web app. > > I use the T5 IOC as a major selling point to using T5 as a web framework, > because they work so well together, and I'm loving the common version > numbering. HiveMind just makes me think of StarCraft. ;-) > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> I've often had a conversation like this in the workplace: >>> >>> colleague: Let's start a new spring project >>> me: I hate spring, how about we use Tapestry IOC instead? >>> colleague: Tapestry, isn't that a web framework? >>> me: Well... yes, but Tapestry (the web framework) is build on >> top >>> of Tapestry IOC which can be used without the web framework >>> colleague: Oh, I didn't know that. >> >> Maybe we could resurrect the HiveMind name? I always loved that name! >> >>> >>> Does anyone else think that Tapestry IOC should have it's own name? (and >>> possibly it's own release cycle) >> >> HiveMind had its own release cycle; this wasn't quite a disaster, but >> it made things much more difficult. I really like that in Tapestry you >> don't need a cheat sheet to figure out which versions of the main >> libraries work together: they all have the same version number. This >> means that for some libraries that don't change from release to >> release you have virtually identical binaries with different version >> numbers, but that's more than acceptable to me. >> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-IOC-Should-it-have-it-s-own-name-tp5716228.html >>> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Howard M. Lewis Ship >> >> Creator of Apache Tapestry >> >> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to >> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! >> >> (971) 678-5210 >> http://howardlewisship.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
